Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39929130›Full record

ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2025

Electrospun SilkMA/silicate-chlorinated cobalt-doped bioactive glass composite for bone regeneration.

Joyce R de Souza, Caroline Anselmi, Lais M Cardoso, Letícia T Kito, Alexandre H Dos Reis-Prado, Pedro H C de Oliveira, Renan Dal-Fabbro, Maedeh Rahimnejad, Tiago M B Campos, Luciano T A Cintra and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Bilayer gelatin-methacryloyl scaffold for pulp inflammation suppression and dentin-like tissue regeneration.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Joyce R de SouzaDepartment of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos, São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Caroline AnselmiDepartment of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Morphology and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lais M CardosoDepartment of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araraquara, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Letícia T KitoDepartment of Materials Manufacture and Automation, Technological Institute of Aeronautics, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Alexandre H Dos Reis-PradoDepartment of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais, School of Dentistry, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Pedro H C de OliveiraDepartment of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Renan Dal-FabbroDepartment of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Maedeh RahimnejadDepartment of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Tiago M B CamposDepartment of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Luciano T A CintraDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Alexandre L S BorgesDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos, São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Marco C BottinoDepartment of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: mbottino@umich.edu.

Funding

Personalized Strategies for Periodontal Tissue Regeneration - A Converged Biofabrication ApproachR01DE031476 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Marco C Bottino · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE031476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone regeneration remains a critical challenge in regenerative medicine, particularly in dentistry, where conditions such as periodontal disease and trauma can lead to significant bone defects. Traditional treatment methods, such as autogenous bone grafting, face limitations, including donor site morbidity and postoperative complications. Recent advancements in biomaterials, particularly silk fibroin-based scaffolds, have shown promise due to their excellent biocompatibility and tunable mechanical properties. Incorporating bioactive glass and metal ions, such as cobalt, into these scaffolds can enhance osteogenic properties and antibacterial effects, creating an optimal environment for bone regeneration. The primary objective of this study was to develop and characterize SilkMA/silicated-chlorinated cobalt-doped bioactive glass composites with the potential for bone regeneration applications. Utilizing the sol-gel method, we synthesized cobalt-doped bioglass, enhancing its bioactivity and antibacterial properties. Mechanical testing, swelling assessments, degradation analysis, and in vitro evaluations using alveolar bone-derived mesenchymal stem cells (aBMSCs) demonstrated the scaffolds' cytocompatibility and favorable physical properties. The structural integrity of the electrospun fibers was confirmed through Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), and Raman Spectroscopy analyses. Incorporating bioglass reduced swelling ratios, while in vitro assays showed that cobalt ions effectively inhibited the biofilm formation of Porphyromonas gingivalis. In vivo analysis using hematoxylin-eosin and von Kossa (vK) staining demonstrated that the SilkMA + 20% BGCo scaffold elicited a minimal inflammatory response, confirming its biocompatibility. However, the absence of positively stained structures in the vK analysis indicated its lack of mineralization potential. In sum, SilkMA/BGCo scaffolds showed promising in vitro potential for bone tissue regeneration and excellent biocompatibility in vivo despite lacking calcium deposition. Further studies with alternative in vivo models are needed to confirm their efficacy.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBone RegenerationCeramicsCobaltFibroinsGlassSilicatesAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsMaterials TestingMesenchymal Stem CellsTissue ScaffoldsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsBioglassCobaltFibroinsSilicatesBone tissue engineeringCobalt-doped bioactive glassElectrospinningSilkMA

Identifiers

PMID39929130
PMCPMC11866460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.