Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928953›Full record

Trial reportBlood advances2025

Randomized phase 2 study to assess the role of single-agent nivolumab to maintain remission in acute myeloid leukemia.

Athalia R Pyzer, Laura W Dillon, Elad Sharon, Theodore G Karrison, Yuanyuan Zha, Noreen Fulton, Gege Gui, Georgia Andrew, Howard Streicher, Kendra Sweet and 23 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02275533 (Randomized Phase II Study to Assess the Role of Nivolumab as Single Agent to Eliminate Minimal Residual Disease and Maintain Remission in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02275533 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

Randomized Phase II Study to Assess the Role of Nivolumab as Single Agent to Eliminate Minimal Residual Disease and Maintain Remission in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Patients After Chemotherapy (REMAIN TRIAL)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2015 to 2026Enrolled82ConditionsAcute Myeloid LeukemiaArmsBiospecimen Collection, Bone Marrow Biopsy, Clinical Observation, Echocardiography Test, Nivolumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Molecularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy in leukemias.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Athalia R PyzerDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-0506-1887
Laura W DillonLaboratory of Myeloid Malignancies, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-4877-9354
Elad SharonDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-0044-9719
Theodore G KarrisonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Yuanyuan ZhaDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Noreen FultonDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Gege GuiLaboratory of Myeloid Malignancies, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Georgia AndrewLaboratory of Myeloid Malignancies, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Howard StreicherDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Kendra SweetDepartment of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.
George YaghmourJane Anne Nohl Division of Hematology and Center for the Study of Blood Diseases, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center of Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Jane Jijun LiuIllinois Cancer Care and Heartland National Community of Oncology Research Programs, Peoria IL.
Brian A JonasDivision of Malignant Hematology/Cellular Therapy and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-4921-5809
Aaron D SchimmerDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Steven GrantDivision of Hematology/Oncology and Palliative Care Virginia Commonwealth University Health Sciences Center, Richmond, VA.
Amer M ZeidanSection of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Gerhard C HildebrandtDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Ellis Fischel Cancer Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
Christopher H LowreyDivision of Hematology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH.
Ryan J MattisonDepartment of Medicine, Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Neil PalmisianoProgram for Hematologic Malignancies, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
Amandeep SalhotraDepartment of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
Dimitrios TzachanisDepartment of Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Maria R BaerDepartment of Medicine, Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Tara L LinDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.ORCID 0000-0002-0242-6449
Prapti PatelServier Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Boston, MA.
Helen ChenDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Walter M StadlerDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Olatoyosi OdenikeDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Richard A LarsonDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0001-9168-3203
Thomas F GajewskiDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Christopher S HouriganLaboratory of Myeloid Malignancies, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-6189-8067
Wendy StockDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Hongtao LiuDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-3190-7807

Funding

Phase I Molecular and Clinical Pharmacodynamic Trials ETCTNUM1CA186717 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI A. Dimitrios Colevas, Alexey V. Danilov · 2014 to 2026
$19.8M
Overcoming resistance to anti-PD1 immunotherapyR35CA210098 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI THOMAS F GAJEWSKI · 2017 to 2026
$10.4M
NCI R50 Clinician Scientist AwardR50CA276013 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Brian A. Jonas · 2023 to 2026
$349k
NCI NIH HHS R35 CA210098NCI NIH HHS R50 CA276013NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractWe conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 study to assess the efficacy of nivolumab (Nivo) as maintenance therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery who were not candidates for stem cell transplant. Patients were stratified and randomized to observation (Obs) or Nivo (3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks for 46 doses). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) defined as time to disease relapse or death due to any reason. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), and evaluation of adverse events (AEs) after Nivo administration. Eighty patients were enrolled with median duration of follow-up of 24 months (33 months among survivors). PFS was 13.2 months in the Nivo arm and 10.9 months in the Obs arm. Overall PFS curves were not statistically significantly different. The median OS was 53.9 months in the Nivo arm and 30.9 months in the Obs arm. There were more AEs of any type (regardless of attribution) on the Nivo arm; 27 patients (71%) on the Nivo arm had a grade ≥3 AE compared with 5 patients (12%) on the Obs arm (P < .001). Nivo maintenance after AML chemotherapy failed to improve the PFS and OS in this randomized phase 2 study. There were increased AEs and serious AEs (SAEs) with Nivo, but these AEs and SAEs were expected and manageable. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02275533.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteNivolumabAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID39928953
PMCPMC12051614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.