Trial reportBlood advances2025
Randomized phase 2 study to assess the role of single-agent nivolumab to maintain remission in acute myeloid leukemia.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02275533 (Randomized Phase II Study to Assess the Role of Nivolumab as Single Agent to Eliminate Minimal Residual Disease and Maintain Remission in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Phase II Study to Assess the Role of Nivolumab as Single Agent to Eliminate Minimal Residual Disease and Maintain Remission in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML) Patients After Chemotherapy (REMAIN TRIAL)
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune Checkpoints in Leukaemia as Gatekeepers of Immuno-Modulation.Immunology · 2026Review
- Maintenance Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Novel treatment strategies in acute myeloid leukemia.Blood research · 2026Review
- TIM-3 in AML: a janus-faced orchestrator of immune exhaustion and leukemic self-renewal.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Molecularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy in leukemias.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Overcoming resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractWe conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 study to assess the efficacy of nivolumab (Nivo) as maintenance therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery who were not candidates for stem cell transplant. Patients were stratified and randomized to observation (Obs) or Nivo (3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks for 46 doses). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) defined as time to disease relapse or death due to any reason. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), and evaluation of adverse events (AEs) after Nivo administration. Eighty patients were enrolled with median duration of follow-up of 24 months (33 months among survivors). PFS was 13.2 months in the Nivo arm and 10.9 months in the Obs arm. Overall PFS curves were not statistically significantly different. The median OS was 53.9 months in the Nivo arm and 30.9 months in the Obs arm. There were more AEs of any type (regardless of attribution) on the Nivo arm; 27 patients (71%) on the Nivo arm had a grade ≥3 AE compared with 5 patients (12%) on the Obs arm (P < .001). Nivo maintenance after AML chemotherapy failed to improve the PFS and OS in this randomized phase 2 study. There were increased AEs and serious AEs (SAEs) with Nivo, but these AEs and SAEs were expected and manageable. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02275533.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.