Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928801›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2025

Percutaneous tracheostomy procedures and patient results in a tertiary intensive care unit: A single-center experience.

Ayşe Vahapoğlu, Ayfer Kaya Gök, Zuhal Çavuş

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ayşe VahapoğluDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6105-4809
Ayfer Kaya Gök
Zuhal Çavuş

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ideal timing for tracheostomy in patients undergoing prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV) in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains controversial. The present study aimed to provide an overview of the timing of percutaneous dilation tracheostomy performed in the ICU over a 5-year period, and the effect of this procedure on 28-day mortality. The study included patients who underwent early (≤14 days) (n = 112) and late (>14 days) (n = 171) tracheostomy during their follow-up in the ICU between 2018 and 2023. It is a single-center retrospective study. The diagnoses, comorbidities, MV duration, tracheostomy timing, tracheostomy indications, tracheostomy complications, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, extubation attempts, mortality, time to decannulation, and ICU discharge location were determined in both tracheostomy groups and compared. The effect of tracheostomy timing on mortality risk was evaluated using multivariate Cox regression analyses. In the early tracheostomy group, MV duration, ICU hospitalization, hospital stay, and extubation attempt were lower. The 28-day intensive care mortality rates were not statistically different between the early and late tracheostomy groups. Multivariate regression analysis showed that mortality risk increased with prolonged MV and tracheostomy complications. In terms of mortality rates in palliative care, mortality in the late tracheostomy group was significantly lower than in the early tracheostomy group. The study demonstrated that the timing of tracheostomy in the ICU had no effect on mortality risk in multivariate analysis. We believe that time is not the only limiting factor when considering tracheostomy and prospective randomized studies are needed.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsRespiration, ArtificialTracheostomyAgedFemaleHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID39928801
PMCPMC11813018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.