ArticleMedicine2025
Rheumatoid arthritis and risk of hearing impairment: A genetic correlation and bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of key factors for early detection of rheumatoid arthritis in primary care using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Immune-mediated cochleovestibular dysfunction: clinical spectrum from isolated inner-ear disorders to systemic autoimmune diseases and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prior research has indicated a connection between rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and hearing impairment (HI), although there is disagreement among researchers. An extensive assessment of the causal relationship between RA and HI was the aim of this Mendelian randomization (MR) study. We examined summary-level data from RA and HL genome-wide association studies using inverse variance weighted (IVW) analysis. We further supplemented the results with weighted median (WM), MR-Egger, MR-RAPS, and maximum likelihood techniques. We used sensitivity analyses to check the accuracy of the MR analysis results. Genetically, higher RA substantially increases the likelihood of HI (IVW: P = 8.78 × 10-03, odds ratio (OR) = 1.014, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.003-1.024). Sensitivity analysis reveals a consistent direction of the association using the following methods: Bayesian MR (P = 8.72 × 10-03, OR = 1.014, 95% CI: 1.004-1.025), MR robust adjustment profile score (P = 2.31 × 10-02, OR = 1.013, 95% CI: 1.002-1.024), maximum likelihood method (P = 2.70 × 10-02, OR = 1.014, 95% CI: 0.996-1.026), WM (P = 1.35 × 10-01, OR = 1.012, 95% CI: 0.996-1.029), and MR-Egger (P = 1.41 × 10-01, OR = 1.011, 95% CI: 0.996-1.027). Despite not achieving statistical significance, the WM and MR-Egger approaches offered reliable guidance. Moreover, we replicated our results on other datasets and obtained similar results (IVW: P = 8.71 × 10-03, OR = 1.016, 95% CI: 1.004-1.028), indicating the validity of our results. Our study provides evidence linking RA to a higher risk of HI. In order to gain more insight into treatments that change the disease or prevent hearing loss, audiological testing is necessary for the diagnosis and follow-up of individuals with RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.