ArticleMedicine2025
The efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in the management of classic and iatrogenic Kaposi sarcoma: An analysis of real-world data.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Demographic Characteristics, Clinical Features, and Treatment Patterns of Classic and AIDS-Related Kaposi Sarcoma: A Multicenter Real-World Study from Turkey.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is a rare angioproliferative malignancy linked to human herpesvirus 8 infection. While systemic therapy is often unnecessary for classic and iatrogenic KS, advanced cases may require chemotherapy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel or oral etoposide as second-line treatments for classical and iatrogenic Kaposi sarcoma. We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of 32 patients diagnosed with classical and iatrogenic KS at a tertiary cancer center between December 2000 and November 2022. Patients received oral etoposide (50 mg every 3 weeks for 10 days) or weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m²). The cohort comprised 23 males (71.9%) and 9 females (28.1%), with a mean age of 63 years. Most patients (87.5%) had classical KS, while 12.5% had iatrogenic KS. The objective response rate (ORR) was 75%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 87.5%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 32.1 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 110.2 months. No significant differences in PFS (P = .633) and OS (P = .456) were observed between paclitaxel and etoposide treatments. The treatment regimen was generally well tolerated. Severe hematological toxicities were less frequent, with febrile neutropenia in 1 patient (3.1%), while severe non-hematological side effects included neuropathy in 2 patients (6.2%). Two patients (6.2%) were hospitalized due to complications, with no treatment-related deaths. Weekly paclitaxel and oral etoposide regimens are effective and well-tolerated second-line treatments for classical and iatrogenic Kaposi sarcoma. Given the high ORR and DCR, these therapies represent viable options for patients who progress after initial treatment. Further studies with larger patient populations are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.