ArticleMedicine2025
The impact of second-victim syndrome on staff well-being and practice.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leadership and Organizational Responses After Patient Safety Incidents: A Systematic Review of Second-Victim Outcomes and Evidence Gaps in Safety Behaviors.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to examine factors influencing psychological well-being and support among healthcare professionals involved in adverse event investigations, complaints, medical errors, and patient injuries from January 2020 to March 2022. The second-victim experience and support tool (SVEST) was used to assess second-victim experiences and support resources. Non-probability purposive sampling was employed, and data were collected through a Monkey Survey sent via email to around 150 clinicians (physicians, nurses, and pharmacists). A total of 100 responses were received. The inclusion criteria required participants to have been involved in adverse event investigations, complaints, medical errors, or patient-related injuries. The SVEST, with 29 items measured on a 5-point Likert scale, evaluated their perceptions of second-victim experiences and support resources. Institutional support was positively perceived by 55.0% of participants, with 52.0% feeling a range of coping resources was available. However, 31.0% felt their well-being was not adequately prioritized. Nonwork-related support was crucial, with 57.0% relying on friends and family. Professional self-efficacy was impacted, with 46.0% feeling inadequate and 39.0% experiencing self-doubt. Turnover intentions were notable, as 39.0% expressed a desire to leave patient care, and 34.0% considered quitting due to stress. This study highlights the need for targeted support systems to address second-victim experiences among healthcare professionals involved in adverse events. Enhancing institutional support, professional self-efficacy, and access to coping resources is crucial. Policymakers and healthcare leaders can help mitigate stress, decrease turnover intentions, and promote psychological resilience by fostering a supportive work environment and providing comprehensive resources, healthcare organizations can improve clinician well-being, reduce stress, and enhance patient care quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.