Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928705›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Determinants of pressure to conceive among reproductive age women in Sub-Saharan Africa: A multilevel analysis of recent Demographic and Health Surveys in five countries.

Alemneh Tadesse Kassie, Alebachew Ferede Zegeye, Astewil Moges Bazezew, Ephrata Yetayeh Mamo, Demiss Mulatu Gebru, Tadesse Tarik Tamir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alemneh Tadesse KassieDepartment of Clinical Midwifery, School of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3829-4100
Alebachew Ferede ZegeyeDepartment of Medical Nursing, School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Astewil Moges BazezewDepartment of Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Ephrata Yetayeh MamoInstitute of public health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Demiss Mulatu GebruDepartment of Health System and Policy Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5737-0457
Tadesse Tarik TamirDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health Nursing, School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, 40% of pregnancies are unplanned, with higher rates in Sub-Saharan Africa, often ending in abortion. Women face pressure from spouses/families to conceive, leading to unintended pregnancies and violations of reproductive rights, jeopardizing women's autonomy and well-being. Respecting individual decisions is crucial during this pivotal life stage. The study conducted a secondary data analysis using information from the latest Demographic and Health Surveys, encompassing five Sub-Saharan African nations from 2021 to 2023. The research focused on a weighted sample of 97,350 married women of reproductive age. Data analysis was performed using Stata 14, employing a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model to uncover the factors contributing to the pressure exerted by husbands and families on women to conceive. The study highlights that in Sub-Saharan Africa, approximately one in ten women experience pressure to conceive. Factors like age (20-35 years; AOR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.46, 1.87), socioeconomic status (middle/affluent; AOR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.2 and AOR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.21), parity (childless; AOR = 4.65, 95% CI: 4.1, 5.2), and community literacy (low; AOR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.25, 1.66) significantly influence this pressure. Notably, women in Tanzania have a 55% lower risk (AOR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.49), while those in Mozambique face a 1.88 times higher risk. The study highlights the substantial pressure faced by reproductive-age women to conceive in Sub-Saharan Africa. Addressing these challenges through targeted policies and interventions is crucial to empower women and promote their reproductive autonomy.

Identifiers

PMID39928705
PMCPMC11809789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.