Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928695›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Pathology and parasitology of free-ranging coyotes from Tennessee and South Carolina.

Eliza Baker, Michelle Dennis, Debra Miller, Chunlei Su, Alexa Rosypal von Dohlen, Mohamed A Abouelkhair, Sarah A Hamer, Alex Jensen, Richard Gerhold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eliza BakerDepartment of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6838-8369
Michelle DennisDepartment of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Debra MillerDepartment of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8544-174X
Chunlei SuDepartment of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Alexa Rosypal von DohlenDepartment of Natural and Behavioral Sciences, Johnson C. Smith University, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States of America.
Mohamed A AbouelkhairDepartment of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0109-6000
Sarah A HamerDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America.
Alex JensenDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Conservation, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America.
Richard GerholdDepartment of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coyotes are exposed to many parasites and pathogens of veterinary and zoonotic concern. To assess the prevalence of the diseases caused by these microbes, we opportunistically obtained coyote samples from a variety of sources including a GPS collaring study, rabies testing facilities, wildlife resources agents, and road-side mortalities. We performed necropsies, serological testing, fecal flotations, and molecular analyses on coyotes from Tennessee and South Carolina. Dirofilaria immitis (heartworm) infected 46% (41/89) of coyotes and was associated with eosinophilic alveolitis and arteritis. Paragonimus kellicotti, a zoonotic lung fluke, was found in 24% (17/71) of Tennessee coyotes, including one coyote with extrapulmonary infection affecting the liver and lymph nodes. Trichinella spp., a zoonotic nematode, was present in 17% (12/71) of Tennessee coyotes but was not associated with muscular inflammation. Sarcoptes scabiei, the causative agent of sarcoptic mange, was detected in one Tennessee coyote. Most coyotes (86% [90/105]) were seropositive for Toxoplasma gondii, while 8.5% (9/106) were seropositive for Trypanosoma cruzi, an emerging zoonotic, vector-borne parasite. This study demonstrated that coyotes are commonly exposed to numerous parasites and pathogens that affect people and pets and are excellent sentinels for these diseases.

Indexed as

CoyotesAnimalsAnimals, WildSouth CarolinaTennessee

Identifiers

PMID39928695
PMCPMC11809884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.