ArticlePloS one2025
Scheduling optimization based on particle swarm optimization algorithm in emergency management of long-distance natural gas pipelines.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper aims to solve the scheduling optimization problem in the emergency management of long-distance natural gas pipelines, with the goal of minimizing the total scheduling time. To this end, the objective function of the minimum total scheduling time is established, and the relevant constraints are set. A scheduling optimization model based on the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is proposed. In view of the high-dimensional complexity and local optimal problems, the neighborhood adaptive constrained fractional particle swarm optimization (NACFPSO) algorithm is used to solve it. The experimental results show that compared with the traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm, NACFPSO performs well in both convergence speed and scheduling time, with an average convergence speed of 81.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 200.00 minutes; while the average convergence speed of the particle swarm optimization algorithm is 82.17 iterations and an average scheduling time of 207.49 minutes. In addition, with the increase of pipeline complexity, NACFPSO can still maintain its advantages in convergence speed and scheduling time, especially in scheduling time, which further verifies the optimization effect of the algorithm in emergency management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.