ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Clinical features of puff adder envenoming: case series of Bitis arietans snakebites in Kenya and a scoping review of the literature.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structural and functional characterisation of isolated puff adder (Toxicon: X · 2026Article
- Biochemical characterisation and substrate-specific proteolytic diversity of venom metalloproteinases in African puff adders.Toxicon: X · 2026Article
- Conserved Enzymatic Peptides inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe puff adder (Bitis arietans) is a medically important snake species found across much of Africa, yet there is limited literature on the clinical features and pathophysiology of envenoming after a puff adder bite.
methodsWe conducted a case-series study to describe the clinical features of patients with puff adder bites who were treated in two primary healthcare facilities in Kenya and complemented our case-series with a scoping review of all published cases of puff adder envenoming that contained sufficient clinical details to highlight the major features.
resultsBetween December 2020 and September 2021, 15 patients were admitted with a suspected puff adder bite (based on the patient's description of the biting snake or confirmed in patients who brought the dead snake or a picture of the biting snake for identification) at the Chemolingot and Mwingi sub-county hospitals in Baringo and Kitui counties, central Kenya. Common local and systemic features on admission included pain (n=15, 100%), swelling (n=14, 93%), and haemorrhage (n=9, 60%). Coagulopathy (n=2, 13%), blistering (n=1, 8%) and shock (n=1, 8%) were less common. In addition, we conducted a literature review and identified 23 studies with detailed descriptions of the clinical features of puff adder envenoming from 37 patients. Local features were common and consistent across cases-swelling (100%, n=37) and pain (95%, n=35). Systemic features were less consistent, with 10 (27%) patients exhibiting hypotension on admission, 10 (27%) patients reporting a fever, and 13 (35%) developing anaemia. Some complications were more common in patients with bites by captive snakes (amputations), compared to patients with bites by wild snakes (hypotension). Snake identification was easier and more accurate after bites by captive snakes, but more challenging for patients bitten in community settings.
conclusionWe combined clinical cases and a literature review to describe the common and less common clinical features of puff adder envenoming. Further clinical research incorporating serial laboratory assays of patients with definitively identified puff adder bites is crucial to better understand the pathophysiology of envenoming by this medically important snake species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.