ArticlePloS one2025
Automated gait event detection for exoskeleton-assisted walking using a long short-term memory model with ground reaction force and heel marker data.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Seamless Human-Computer Interaction Enabled by Wearable Biointerfaces and Intelligent Systems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional gait event detection methods for heel strike and toe-off utilize thresholding with ground reaction force (GRF) or kinematic data, while recent methods tend to use neural networks. However, when subjects' walking behaviors are significantly altered by an assistive walking device, these detection methods tend to fail. Therefore, this paper introduces a new long short-term memory (LSTM)-based model for detecting gait events in subjects walking with a pair of custom ankle exoskeletons. This new model was developed by multiplying the weighted output of two LSTM models, one with GRF data as the input and one with heel marker height as input. The gait events were found using peak detection on the final model output. Compared to other machine learning algorithms, which use roughly 8:1 training-to-testing data ratio, this new model required only a 1:79 training-to-testing data ratio. The algorithm successfully detected over 98% of events within 16ms of manually identified events, which is greater than the 65% to 98% detection rate of previous LSTM algorithms. The high robustness and low training requirements of the model makes it an excellent tool for automated gait event detection for both exoskeleton-assisted and unassisted walking of healthy human subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.