Observational studyPloS one2025
Factors influencing sepsis associated thrombocytopenia (SAT): A multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting thrombocytopenia in sepsis patients treated with linezolid.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
- XGBoost outperforms other machine learning models in diagnosing Sepsis-Associated Thrombocytopenia: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Prognostic impact of persistent versus transient sepsis-associated thrombocytopenia in multicohort data.iScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSepsis associated thrombocytopenia (SAT) is a common complication of sepsis. We designed this study to investigate factors influencing SAT.
methodsPatients with sepsis (2984 in Peking union medical college hospital [PUMCH] database, 13165 in eICU Collaborative Research [eICU] database, 11101 in Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV [MIMIC-IV] database) were enrolled. Variables included basic information, comorbidities, and organ functions. Multi-variable logistic regression models and artificial neural network model were applied to determine the factors related to SAT. MAIN
resultsAge and body mass index (BMI) were inversely correlated with the incidence of SAT (p-value 0.175 and 0.049 [PUMCH], p-value 0.000 and 0.000 [eICU], p-value 0.000 and 0.000 [MIMIC-IV]). Hematologic malignancies and other malignancies were positively correlated with the incidence of SAT (p-value 0.000 and 0.000 [PUMCH], p-value 0.000 and 0.000 [eICU], p-value 0.000 and 0.020 [MIMIC-IV]) except other malignancies was inversely correlated with the incidence of SAT in PUMCH database. Norepinephrine (NE) equivalents, total bilirubin (TBIL) and creatinine were positively correlated with the incidence of SAT (p-value 0.000, 0.000 and 0.011 [PUMCH], p-value 0.028, 0.000 and 0.013 [eICU], p-value 0.028, 0.000 and 0.027 [MIMIC-IV]). PaO2 / FiO2 was inversely correlated with the incidence of SAT in PUMCH database (p-value 0.021 [PUMCH]), while it was positively correlated with the incidence of SAT (p-value 0.000 [MIMIC-IV]). PaO2 / FiO2 and SAT was not related (p-value 0.111 [eICU]). TBIL, hematologic malignancies, PaO2 / FiO2 and NE equivalents ranked in the top five significant variables in all three datasets.
conclusionsHematologic malignancies and other malignancies were positively correlated with the incidence of SAT. NE equivalents, TBIL and creatinine were positively correlated with the incidence of SAT. TBIL, hematologic malignancies, PaO2 / FiO2 and NE equivalents ranked in the top significant variables in factors influencing SAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.