Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928624›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Perception of four intellectual and developmental disabilities based on search engine and news portrayal.

Lillian J Droscha, Sophia Chung, Zoe Li-Khan, Ashley Scott, Eric Rubenstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lillian J DroschaDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0006-6092-3626
Sophia ChungDepartment of Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Zoe Li-KhanDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Ashley ScottDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Eric RubensteinDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9146-4497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, other's perceptions of them based on their condition often begin before birth and go on to impact relationships, opportunities, and self perception across the life course. Search engine results and news media, which may portray these conditions stereotypically or in poor light, are often a key source in these perceptions. Our purpose was to understand how search engine results and available news media can shape perceptions on certain intellectual and developmental disabilities.

methodsWe developed an online Likert-scale survey to measure differences in perceptions based off first available search engine results, images, and news headlines of four intellectual and developmental disabilities: cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, and Angelman syndrome. These four conditions were selected to compare less prevalent (Prader-Willi and Angelman) and more prevalent conditions (Down syndrome and cerebral palsy). Perception questions addressed general impression and aspects of the disability experience expected to be impacted by perception from others. We recruited via multiple social media platforms, flyers posted in the Boston area, and word of mouth to local communities and friends.

findings229 individuals opened the survey, and 125 responses were used in analysis. Mean responses to Prader-Willi syndrome were significantly more negative than responses to cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, and Angelman syndrome across all variables. Responses to Angelman syndrome were also more negative than responses to Down syndrome. Significant differences between conditions found when treating the data as continuous were confirmed when treating the data as ordinal.

conclusionLesser-known intellectual and developmental disabilities, such as Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome, are subject to more negative portrayal in media, leading to more negative perception, which may impact social opportunity and quality of life. Combined with our finding that the perception of Prader-Willi syndrome follows the ideals of the medical model of disability more closely than the social model, a need for social model of disability training and education for physicians and other medical providers is clear.

Indexed as

Developmental DisabilitiesIntellectual DisabilityMass MediaPerceptionSearch EngineAdolescentAdultAngelman SyndromeCerebral PalsyDown SyndromeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrader-Willi SyndromeSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39928624
PMCPMC11809880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.