Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928622›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

HybridBranchNetV2: Towards reliable artificial intelligence in image classification using reinforcement learning.

Ebrahim Parcham, Mansoor Fateh, Vahid Abolghasemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ebrahim ParchamFaculty of Computer Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.
Mansoor FatehFaculty of Computer Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2133-3480
Vahid AbolghasemiSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2151-5180

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms struggle to adapt effectively in dynamic real-world scenarios, such as complex classification tasks and object relationship extraction, due to their predictable but non-adaptive behavior. This paper introduces HybridBranchNetV2, an optimized hybrid architecture designed to address these challenges. The key novelty of our approach lies in the integration of reinforcement learning for adaptive feature extraction and the use of graph-based techniques to analyze object relationships in complex environments. By dynamically adjusting feature extraction based on feedback from the environment, the model improves adaptability, while graph-based methods allow for a more comprehensive analysis of object relationships. Our extensive evaluations demonstrate that HybridBranchNetV2 achieves average 91.75% accuracy over four different challenging datasets. In particular, a 14% improvement obtained on the Visual Genome dataset and ImageNet 1K compared to the original HybridBranchNet model. Additional testing on CIFAR, Flowers, and ImageNet datasets revealed improvements of 6%, 1%, and 6%, respectively. These advancements not only enhance classification accuracy but also ensure efficient computation, making HybridBranchNetV2 suitable for real-time applications with minimal risk of overfitting. The proposed framework demonstrates significant improvements in adaptability, performance, and computational efficiency, addressing critical limitations in current AI models.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID39928622
PMCPMC11809806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.