Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928531›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2025

Incidence and Survival of Children and Adolescents With Wilms Tumor, United States, 2001-2020.

Andres F Espinoza, Ekene Onwuka, David A Siegel, Shifan Dai, Sanjeev A Vasudevan, Michael E Scheurer, Philip J Lupo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Disparities in Rural-Urban Cancer Care Outcomes among Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Populations: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andres F EspinozaDivisions of Pediatric Surgery and Surgical Research, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Surgical Oncology Program and Liver Tumor Program, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8716-3125
Ekene OnwukaDivisions of Pediatric Surgery and Surgical Research, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Surgical Oncology Program and Liver Tumor Program, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
David A SiegelDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Shifan DaiCyberdata Technologies Inc., Herndon, Virginia, USA.
Sanjeev A VasudevanDivisions of Pediatric Surgery and Surgical Research, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Surgical Oncology Program and Liver Tumor Program, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michael E ScheurerDepartment of Pediatrics, Hematology-Oncology Section, Texas Children's Hospital, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Philip J LupoDepartment of Pediatrics, Hematology-Oncology Section, Texas Children's Hospital, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0978-5863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWilms tumor (WT) is the most common pediatric malignancy of the kidney. Past studies describing WT incidence and survival used surveillance data with < 30% of the US population. We evaluated differences in WT incidence and survival comparing demographic groups and tumor characteristics.

methodsWe analyzed new cases of WT among patients aged < 20 years at diagnosis by using incidence data from US Cancer Statistics (USCS) for 2003-2020 and 5-year relative survival (RS) data from the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) for 2001-2019. To assess incidence trends, average annual percent change (AAPC) was calculated by using joinpoint regression. Relative survival (RS) and all-cause survival were calculated overall and by demographic and clinical variables.

resultsDuring 2003-2020, 8218 cases of WT were reported in USCS, which represented an age-adjusted incidence rate of 5.7 cases per million. Rates were the highest among females (6.3), children aged 0-4 years (17.2), and non-Hispanic Black patients (7.1). Overall, trends remained stable (AAPC = -0.4, 95% CI: -1.4 to 0.4). Among 7567 cases of WT in NPCR, 5-year RS was 92.6%. Patients with the lowest survival include the following: those aged 10-19 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.02-2.65); non-Hispanic Black patients (HR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.11-1.76); those with regional stage (HR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.47-2.54) or distant stage (HR = 5.12, 95% CI: 3.99-6.57); and patients from nonmetropolitan counties (HR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.09-1.96). Individuals diagnosed during 2011-2019 (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53-0.77) had higher survival than those diagnosed during 2001-2010.

conclusionsThe highest WT incidence rates were patients who were female, 0-4 years, and non-Hispanic Black. Survival improved during the study period; survival differed by race, ethnicity, metropolitan status, and age. Further studies to delineate the causes of these disparities may improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Kidney NeoplasmsWilms TumorAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRegistriesSEER ProgramSurvival RateUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39928531
PMCPMC11809554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.