ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025
Approach to Janus kinase inhibition for juvenile dermatomyositis among CARRA and PReS providers.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesJanus kinase inhibition (JAKi) has been proposed as a treatment for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies to target increased interferon signalling. Predominantly retrospective reports have demonstrated effectiveness of JAKi in refractory JDM. However, JAKi remains an off-label treatment for JDM and there may be variation in use worldwide. An international survey was conducted to investigate approaches to JAKi for JDM.
methodsThe Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) JDM Therapeutics workgroup and core members of the Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PReS) JDM working party devised an electronic survey to assess the use of JAKi in JDM. CARRA and PReS members were invited by e-mail to complete the survey.
resultsThere were 229 respondents (18%), with 50% from the USA and 29% from Europe. One hundred and fifty had used JAKi for over 450 patients with JDM; among them, 77% noted clinical improvement in most or all patients and 17% reported side effects. The highest ranked perceived barriers to JAKi use were lack of clinical data and inability to obtain insurance approval. The highest ranked clinical indications for starting JAKi were refractory skin disease, refractory muscle disease, inability to wean steroids and intolerance to other steroid-sparing agents.
conclusionPaediatric rheumatologists use JAKi off-label for refractory JDM. Most providers noted clinical improvement in their patients. Barriers to JAKi use include lack of clinical data and insurance coverage. Clinical trials are needed to provide better data on the efficacy and safety of JAKi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.