ArticleJAMA network open2025
Incidence of Newly Diagnosed Cancer After Cerebral Venous Thrombosis.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis Revealing ALK-Positive Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma in a Patient with Inherited Thrombophilia and Concomitant Infection: Case Report and Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cerebral Veins and Dural Sinuses Thrombosis: Data from a Monocentric Cohort Study of 55 Romanian Patients.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Risk factors for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in Xinjiang, China: a single-center case-control study with a focus on high-altitude exposure.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Venous Thromboembolism Management and Anticoagulation Opportunities in Cancer Patients.European cardiology · 2026Review
- Cerebral venous thrombosis: Current management, recent advances and future directions.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Active cancer is a risk factor for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), but whether CVT is associated with occult cancer is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the incidence of newly diagnosed cancer after CVT. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study used data from the Dutch Hospital Discharge Registry from January 1, 1997, to July 1, 2020. Analyses were conducted between June 2023 and April 2024. Patients admitted with a first-ever CVT were included. Patients with a history of cancer or diagnosed with cancer during hospitalization for CVT were excluded. Exposure: CVT was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was cumulative incidence of cancer after CVT. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated relative to a matched cohort from the general population using the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Results: A total of 2649 patients with CVT (median [IQR] age, 44.5 [30.7-56.4] years; 1856 [70.1%] female) were included. Cancer was diagnosed in 119 patients during a median (IQR) follow-up of 4.7 (1.9-8.9) years, of whom 29 (24.4%) had hematologic cancer. The cumulative incidence of cancer was 5.9% (95% CI, 4.8%-7.2%) after 10 years and was highest in men aged 50 years or older (13.5%; 95% CI, 9.1%-18.7%). Patients with CVT had an increased rate of cancer compared with the reference cohort during the entire follow-up, but the difference narrowed over time (SIRs of 3.35 [95% CI, 2.41-4.55] and 1.40 [95% CI, 1.14-1.69] at 1 and 10 years, respectively). The rate was increased both in patients younger than 50 years (SIRs of 6.70 [95% CI, 3.97-10.59] and 1.72 [95% CI, 1.24-2.34] at 1 and 10 years, respectively) and those 50 years or older (SIRs of 2.41 [95% CI, 1.53-3.62] and 1.25 [95% CI, 0.96-1.60] at 1 and 10 years, respectively), as well as in male patients (SIRs of 3.59 [95% CI, 2.16-5.61] and 1.69 [95% CI, 1.25-2.23] at 1 and 10 years, respectively) and female patients (SIRs, 3.17 [95% CI, 1.99-4.80] and 1.22 [95% CI, 0.92-1.58] at 1 and 10 years, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of patients with CVT found an increased risk of cancer during follow-up regardless of age or sex. Men 50 years or older had the highest absolute risk, whereas younger patients had the highest relative risk. Physicians should be vigilant for signs of cancer after CVT, and further research on screening for cancer after CVT is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.