Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928336›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Incidence of Newly Diagnosed Cancer After Cerebral Venous Thrombosis.

Anita van de Munckhof, Jamie I Verhoeven, Ilonca C H Vaartjes, Nick van Es, Frank-Erik de Leeuw, Jonathan M Coutinho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cerebral venous thrombosis: Current management, recent advances and future directions.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anita van de MunckhofDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jamie I VerhoevenDepartment of Neurology, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Ilonca C H VaartjesDepartment of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Nick van EsDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Frank-Erik de LeeuwDepartment of Neurology, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jonathan M CoutinhoDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Active cancer is a risk factor for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), but whether CVT is associated with occult cancer is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the incidence of newly diagnosed cancer after CVT. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study used data from the Dutch Hospital Discharge Registry from January 1, 1997, to July 1, 2020. Analyses were conducted between June 2023 and April 2024. Patients admitted with a first-ever CVT were included. Patients with a history of cancer or diagnosed with cancer during hospitalization for CVT were excluded. Exposure: CVT was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was cumulative incidence of cancer after CVT. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated relative to a matched cohort from the general population using the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Results: A total of 2649 patients with CVT (median [IQR] age, 44.5 [30.7-56.4] years; 1856 [70.1%] female) were included. Cancer was diagnosed in 119 patients during a median (IQR) follow-up of 4.7 (1.9-8.9) years, of whom 29 (24.4%) had hematologic cancer. The cumulative incidence of cancer was 5.9% (95% CI, 4.8%-7.2%) after 10 years and was highest in men aged 50 years or older (13.5%; 95% CI, 9.1%-18.7%). Patients with CVT had an increased rate of cancer compared with the reference cohort during the entire follow-up, but the difference narrowed over time (SIRs of 3.35 [95% CI, 2.41-4.55] and 1.40 [95% CI, 1.14-1.69] at 1 and 10 years, respectively). The rate was increased both in patients younger than 50 years (SIRs of 6.70 [95% CI, 3.97-10.59] and 1.72 [95% CI, 1.24-2.34] at 1 and 10 years, respectively) and those 50 years or older (SIRs of 2.41 [95% CI, 1.53-3.62] and 1.25 [95% CI, 0.96-1.60] at 1 and 10 years, respectively), as well as in male patients (SIRs of 3.59 [95% CI, 2.16-5.61] and 1.69 [95% CI, 1.25-2.23] at 1 and 10 years, respectively) and female patients (SIRs, 3.17 [95% CI, 1.99-4.80] and 1.22 [95% CI, 0.92-1.58] at 1 and 10 years, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of patients with CVT found an increased risk of cancer during follow-up regardless of age or sex. Men 50 years or older had the highest absolute risk, whereas younger patients had the highest relative risk. Physicians should be vigilant for signs of cancer after CVT, and further research on screening for cancer after CVT is warranted.

Indexed as

Intracranial ThrombosisNeoplasmsVenous ThrombosisAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsRegistriesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID39928336
PMCPMC11811797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.