Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928329›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2025

Lung Cancer Screening and Incidental Findings: A Research Agenda: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.

Louise M Henderson, Roger Y Kim, Nichole T Tanner, Emily B Tsai, Abbie Begnaud, Farouk Dako, Michael Gieske, Kimberly Kallianos, Ilana Richman, Lori C Sakoda and 10 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Improving lung cancer screening diagnostic efficiency.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Lung Cancer Screening and Prevention: Beyond Conventional Strategies in a Rapidly Changing Global Milieu.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Updates in Lung Cancer Screening: A Decade of Evidence.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Prevalence of bronchiectasis: a narrative review.Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Funding

Evaluating Lung Cancer Screening Patterns and Outcomes through a North Carolina RegistryR01CA212014 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Louise Henderson · 2017 to 2026
$5.4M
Assessment of a Radiomics-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis Tool for Cancer Risk Stratification of Pulmonary NodulesK08CA279881 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Roger Yeon-Kyu Kim · 2023 to 2026
$998k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA279881NCI NIH HHS R01 CA212014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerIncidental FindingsLung NeoplasmsMass ScreeningTomography, X-Ray ComputedDelphi TechniqueHumansSocieties, MedicalUnited Statescardiovascular diseaseincidental findingslung cancer screeningnet benefits

Identifiers

PMID39928329
PMCPMC11936151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.