ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
Towards ultra-low-dose CT for detecting pulmonary nodules using DenseNet.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Low-radiation techniques should be used to detect and follow lung nodules on CT images, but reducing radiation dose to ultra-low-dose CT with submilliSievert dose level would drastically impede image quality and sensitivity for nodule detection. This study investigated the feasibility of using DenseNet to suppress image noise in ultra-low-dose CT for lung cancer screening. DenseNet was trained using input-label pairs from 1, 2, 4, and 6 patients. After training, the model was tested with chest CT from 14 patients that were not used in training process. Seven patients have solid nodules and 7 patients have subsolid nodules. Root mean square error (RMSE) and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) were calculated to quantify the difference between reference and test images. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between lung nodule and lung parenchyma was calculated to evaluate the target detectability of chest CT. Subjective image quality assessment was performed using 4-point ranking scale to evaluate the visual quality of CT images perceived by end user. Substantial improvements in RMSE and PSNR were observed after denoising. The lung nodules in denoised images could be distinguished more easily in comparison with those in the original ultra-low-dose CT, which is supported by the CNRs and subjective image quality scores. The comparison of intensity profiles for lung nodules demonstrated that the image noise in ultra-low-dose CT could be suppressed effectively after denoising without causing edge blurring or variation in Hounsfield unit (HU) values. A two-sample t-test revealed no statistically significant differences between full-dose CT and denoised ultra-low-dose CT in the evaluation of lung nodules, lung parenchyma, paraspinal muscle, or vertebral body. Since the linear no-threshold model suggests that no amount of ionizing radiation is entirely risk-free, the quest for further dose reduction remains a consistently important focus in radiology. Overall, our findings suggest that DenseNet could be a viable approach for reducing image noise in ultra-low-dose CT scans used for lung cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39928290What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.