ArticleVirus genes2025
Genomic and epidemiological surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 variants during the pre-mass vaccination period in Botucatu, Brazil.
Article in Virus genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused an unprecedented pandemic in human history. To date, more than 6.5 million lives have been lost to COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019). Following widespread efforts for COVID-19 vaccination in Brazil, there has been a drastic reduction in COVID-19 deaths, which was particularly evident in the city of Botucatu, SP, Brazil, after a campaign to a mass vaccination. Our objective was to assess the temporal and epidemiological spread of variants of concern (VOC) of SARS-CoV-2 in the four weeks preceding the massive vaccination campaign in the municipality. After randomizing 400 samples, Next-Generation Sequencing was used to produce sequences and determine the variants. Among high-quality sequences, 98.4% belonged to the VOC Gamma, with P.1 and P.1.14 being the most prevalent lineages. P.1 was more frequent in both men and women, and in younger individuals and adults (0-59 years) compared to P.1.14. There was no correlation between the variants and the presence of comorbidities or between them and moderate to severe clinical cases of COVID-19 or death. However, P.1 was more frequent than P.1.14 in people with mild forms of the disease and in those who exhibited symptoms. In the phylogenetic analyses, a small cluster of 9 P.1.14 samples containing mutations in ORF1a: M584V and A3620V was observed, which had not been found in any Gamma sequences to date. The importance of genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 is evident in assisting public health decision-making and the management of COVID-19 and other diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39928246What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.