Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928214›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2025

FrAMBI: A Software Framework for Auditory Modeling Based on Bayesian Inference.

Roberto Barumerli, Piotr Majdak

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roberto BarumerliAcoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Dominikanerbastei 15, Vienna, 1010, Austria. roberto.barumerli@oeaw.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0918-3766
Piotr MajdakAcoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Dominikanerbastei 15, Vienna, 1010, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1511-6164

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 101017743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in hearing science often relies on auditory models to describe listener's behaviour and its neural underpinning in acoustic environments. These models gather empirical evidence from behavioural data to address research questions on the neural mechanisms underlying sound perception. Despite seemingly similar statistical methods, auditory models are often implemented for each study separately, which hinders reproducibility and across-study comparisons, thus limiting the advancement at a field level. Here, we introduce a framework for studying neural mechanisms of sound perception by employing auditory modeling based on Bayesian inference (FrAMBI), a MATLAB/Octave toolbox. FrAMBI provides a standardized structure to implement an auditory model following the perception-action cycle and enables the automatic application of statistical analysis with behavioural data. We show FrAMBI's capabilities in several examples with increasing levels of complexity within the context of sound source localisation tasks: a basic implementation for a static scenario, iterating over the perception-action cycle with a moving sound source, the definition of multiple model variants testing different neural mechanisms, and the procedure for parameter estimation and model comparison. Being integrated into the widely used auditory modelling toolbox (AMT), FrAMBI is planned to be maintained in the long term and expanded accordingly, fostering reproducible research in the field of neuroscience.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionModels, NeurologicalSoftwareAcoustic StimulationBayes TheoremHumansSound LocalizationAuditory modelingBayesian statisticsBehavioral simulationComputational neuroscienceModel-based analysisSound localization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.