Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928165›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of urology2025

Discrepancies between physician-assessed and patient-reported complications after cystectomy - a prospective analysis.

Benedikt Ebner, Judith Hirsch, Annkathrin Holz, Yannic Volz, Lennert Eismann, Julian Hermans, Nikolaos Pyrgidis, Marc Kidess, Marie Semmler, Isabel Brinkmann and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05153694 (Infectious Complications After Cystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05153694 recruitingnot on this map

Infectious Complications After Cystectomy: A Prospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorLudwig-Maximilians - University of MunichRan2021 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsBladder Cancer, Infections, Infection, Bacterial, Infection, HospitalArmsCystectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Benedikt EbnerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany. Benedikt.Ebner@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Judith HirschDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Annkathrin HolzDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Yannic VolzDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lennert EismannDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julian HermansDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nikolaos PyrgidisDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marc KidessDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marie SemmlerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Isabel BrinkmannDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Can AydogduDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Michael ChaloupkaDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andrea Katharina LindnerDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Philipp WeinholdDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christian G StiefDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Gerald B SchulzDepartment of Urology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite the high incidence of perioperative complications following cystectomy, there is a lack of evidence regarding patients' perceptions. Moreover, discrepancies between established complication grading systems and the patient's perspective remain unexplored.

methodsWe prospectively evaluated perioperative complications after cystectomy using the Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC) and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). The CDC and CCI were compared to patient-reported complication grades through Spearman correlation analysis. Discrepancies between physician-assessed and patient-reported complication grades were then evaluated. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05153694).

resultsBetween December 2021 and March 2024, 172 patients underwent open cystectomy at our department. Of those, 154 provided written consent to participate in the study, and 111 completed the post-discharge questionnaire. We found a moderate correlation between physician-assessed and patient-reported complication grades (CDC: r = 0.34, CCI: r = 0.39; p < 0.001). Patients with matching grades were defined as realists (50%). Those who reported lower complication grades than assessed by physicians were defined as optimists (38%), while those who reported higher grades were defined as pessimists (12%). Optimists rated the preoperative medical information better than pessimists ("very good": 79% vs. 38%, p = 0.006). We found no significant differences between optimists and pessimists regarding age, gender, tumor characteristics or educational level.

conclusionIn our prospective study, the correlation between physician-assessed and patient-reported complication grades was only moderate. Only half of the cystectomy patients accurately perceived the severity of their complications. Our findings represent the first study to investigate patients' perspectives on complications in urology and underscore the importance of thorough preoperative medical information.

Indexed as

CystectomyPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPostoperative ComplicationsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesClavien-Dindo classificationComplicationsComprehensive Complication IndexCystectomyOptimistPatient reported outcomePessimistPreoperative medical information

Identifiers

PMID39928165
PMCPMC11811455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.