Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928164›Full record

ArticleCalcified tissue international2025

Impact of Resistance Training on Bone During 40% Caloric Restriction in Growing Female Rats.

Ken D Sumida, Daniel L Smithers, Aaron Gerston, Kim A Lagerborg, S Victoria Jaque, Fred Caporaso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Calcified tissue international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ken D SumidaDepartment of Health Sciences and Food Science Orange, Chapman University, One University Drive, Orange, CA, 92866, USA. sumida@chapman.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5025-2618
Daniel L SmithersDepartment of Health Sciences and Food Science Orange, Chapman University, One University Drive, Orange, CA, 92866, USA.
Aaron GerstonDepartment of Health Sciences and Food Science Orange, Chapman University, One University Drive, Orange, CA, 92866, USA.
Kim A LagerborgDepartment of Health Sciences and Food Science Orange, Chapman University, One University Drive, Orange, CA, 92866, USA.
S Victoria JaqueDepartment of Kinesiology, California State University, Northridge, Northridge, CA, USA.
Fred CaporasoDepartment of Health Sciences and Food Science Orange, Chapman University, One University Drive, Orange, CA, 92866, USA.

Funding

Chapman University Faculty Research Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing trend in the use of severe caloric restrictive diets among normal weight young females that can jeopardize bone health. Using an animal model, the purpose of this study was to determine whether resistance training (RT) could maintain bone health during a 6-week severe caloric restrictive (CR) diet in growing female rats. Twenty-four female rats (~ 8 weeks old) were randomly divided into the following groups: sedentary rats fed a normal diet (N = 8), sedentary rats fed a 40% CR diet (D = 8), and an RT group fed a 40% CR diet (DT = 8). The DT group climbed a vertical ladder four consecutive times (per exercise session) with weights appended to their tail 3 days/week for a total of 6 weeks. Tibial bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans and bone mechanical properties were measured. After 6 weeks, the body mass (Mean ± SD) of CR-fed groups (D & DT = 202.8 ± 10.7 g) was significantly lower than N (275.5 ± 25.3 g). Tibial BMD (g/cm

Indexed as

Bone and BonesBone DensityCaloric RestrictionPhysical Conditioning, AnimalResistance TrainingAbsorptiometry, PhotonAnimalsFemaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTibiaBMDBone mechanical propertiesDietTibia

Identifiers

PMID39928164
PMCPMC11811438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.