Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39928077›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Dry Needling in Sports and Sport Recovery: A Systematic Review with an Evidence Gap Map.

Adrian Kużdżał, Robert Trybulski, Jarosław Muracki, Sebastian Klich, Filipe Manuel Clemente, Adam Kawczyński

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07612969 (Comparing the Effect of Dry Needle, Acupuncture and Sham Needling When Added to Muscle Release Technique on Knee Range of Motion, Unipedal Balance and Jump Height in Active Men), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07612969 nacompletednot on this map

Comparing the Effect of Dry Needle, Acupuncture and Sham Needling When Added to Muscle Release Technique on Knee Range of Motion, Unipedal Balance and Jump Height in Active Men: A Randomized Control Single Blinded Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMohamad KaramRan2023 to 2023Enrolled65ConditionsHealthy Adult Males, Healthy SubjectsArmsProprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Dry Needling, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Acupuncture, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation with Sham needling, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adrian KużdżałInstitute of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences and Psychology, Collegium Medicum, University of Rzeszów, Rejtana Street 16C, 35-959, Rzeszów, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5685-3139
Robert TrybulskiDepartment of Medical Sciences, The Wojciech Korfanty School of Economics, 40-065, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4276-4813
Jarosław MurackiInstitute of Physical Culture Sciences, Faculty of Health and Physical Education, University of Szczecin, 70-453, Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7470-1921
Sebastian KlichDepartment of Sport Didactics, Wrocław University of Health and Sport Sciences, 51-612, Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8182-2975
Filipe Manuel ClementeEscola Superior Desporto e Lazer, Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares, 4900-347, Viana do Castelo, Portugal. filipe.clemente5@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9813-2842
Adam KawczyńskiDepartment of Biomechanics and Sport Engineering, Gdańsk University of Physical Education and Sport, 80-336, Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7840-3799

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDry needling is an increasingly popular technique used in sports and regenerative medicine contexts. However, there is no comprehensive overview of investigations of dry needling in sports and sport recovery.

objectivesThe objectives were to perform a systematic review of dry needling in sports athletes with an evidence gap map, to identify current gaps in the literature, and to provide stakeholders with direction for future research.

methodsPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines were followed. Studies on healthy and injured athletes receiving dry needling were included. Three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched, data were synthesized narratively, key data were summarized quantitatively, and an evidence gap map was created.

resultsThe authors incorporated 24 studies into the current study, encompassing 580 athletes, predominantly involving talent/developmental and highly trained/national-level athletes across 13 sports. Most studies used passive or placebo controls, with 37.5% incorporating active controls. Interventions focused mainly on the lower limbs (58.3%). Around 69% of studies reported pain perception outcomes, while six examined muscular strength, activity, and range of motion. While results varied, dry needling generally showed a more positive effect on pain than on athletic performance.

conclusionsDry needling studies seem to describe general effectiveness and safety for reducing pain and muscle stiffness in a wide variety of body regions. However, further research is needed on underrepresented populations such as elite, world-class, and Paralympic athletes, as well as expanding investigations into long-term effects and a broader range of muscle groups, particularly the hamstrings. The results may be valuable for medical professionals, sports medicine specialists, and researchers. REGISTRATION: OSF project no.: osf.io osf.io/h3yeq.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesDry NeedlingAthletesAthletic PerformanceEvidence GapsHumansMuscle StrengthRange of Motion, Articular

Identifiers

PMID39928077
PMCPMC12011942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.