ArticleMedical physics2025
Monte Carlo study of gold nanoparticle-mediated radiosensitization effects using nanoscale cell model combined with fractal-based DNA model.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGold nanoparticles (GNPs) are promising radiosensitizers in radiation therapy, yet the exact mechanisms behind their effectiveness remain not fully understood. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations have been used to study extra energy deposition and increased DNA damage by the secondary electrons from intracellularly present GNPs, which are believed to be the key physical mechanisms responsible for the radiosensitization effects observed in many radiobiological studies. However, discrepancies between experimental results and computational predictions persist. While often attributed to purely biological effects, such discrepancies, from a physical modeling point of view, can also be due to the use of MC models constructed with simplified cellular/DNA geometries and unrealistic GNP distributions. To address this challenge, higher-resolution nanoscale models with realistic GNP distributions and detailed cellular/DNA structures are needed. In principle, computational results from such nanoscale models can be not only more accurate but also directly correlated with experimental results for biological outcome modeling. PURPOSE: The main purpose of this MC study was to investigate the potential increase in radiation-induced DNA damage due to internalized GNPs by using a nanoscale cell model including realistic GNP distributions and detailed cellular/DNA structures.
methodsTwo high-resolution nanoscale cellular geometry models, featuring the nucleus filled with fractal-patterned DNA fibers, were constructed from transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of GNP-laden human colorectal tumor cells. These models were used to simulate the initial yield of single- and double-strand breaks (SSBs and DSBs) of DNA under orthovoltage (250 kVp) and megavoltage (6 MV) photon beam irradiation. In-depth Geant4 MC simulations were conducted to assess radiation-induced effects due to intracellular GNP presence and absence, focusing on the computation of SSBs/DSBs and their causative mechanisms - direct or indirect effects of ionizing radiation. Penelope and Geant4-DNA for Gold (G4_DNA_Au) physics models were employed for GNPs, and the difference between those two physics models were also evaluated.
resultsThe simulation results revealed a notable enhancement in the nucleus dose and DNA damage due to intracellular GNP presence, with maximum dose enhancements observed at 4.24% and 4.34% for 250 kVp, and 3.04% and 3.22% for 6 MV irradiation using the Penelope and G4_DNA_Au physics models, respectively. Crucially, this study found that indirect yields of both SSB and DSB were significantly higher than their direct counterparts, emphasizing the dominance of indirect DNA damage mechanisms. SSB enhancements were recorded between 2.36% and 3.46%, while DSB enhancements were more significant, ranging from 7.36% to 10.33%, across various scenarios and photon energies under the G4_DNA_Au physics model. The 250 kVp beam showed more SSB enhancement, whereas the 6 MV beam yielded more DSB enhancement.
conclusionWith a realistic fractal-based chromatin fiber arrangement of DNA within the nucleus, the currently developed TEM-based cellular geometry model enabled the unprecedented investigation of radiation-induced DNA damage in a single GNP-laden cell using track structure Geant4 MC simulations. The modeling approaches and findings from this study significantly enhance our ability and knowledge to conduct computational investigations of GNP-mediated radiosensitization, possibly leading to the development of a predictive biological outcome model with minimal empiricism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.