Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39927868›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2025

Sample Size Estimations Based on Human Microbiome Temporal Stability Over 6 Months: A Shallow Shotgun Metagenome Sequencing Analysis.

Semi Zouiouich, Yunhu Wan, Emily Vogtmann, Carolina Porras, Christian C Abnet, Jianxin Shi, Rashmi Sinha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Semi ZouiouichDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-0263-3285
Yunhu WanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-6556-0602
Emily VogtmannDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-1355-5593
Carolina PorrasCosta Rican Agency for Biomedical Research-INCIENSA Foundation, San José, Costa Rica.ORCID 0000-0002-4592-3883
Christian C AbnetDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-3008-7843
Jianxin ShiDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-8606-4707
Rashmi SinhaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-2466-7462

Funding

Microbes and Human MalignanciesZIACP010214 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI VOGTMANN, EMILY · 2010 to 2021
$5.5M
Division of Intramural Research (DIR)Intramural NIH HHS ZIA CP010214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiological factors affect the human microbiome, highlighting the need for reasonably estimating sample sizes in future population studies.

methodsWe assessed the temporal stability of fecal microbiome diversity, species composition, and genes and functional pathways through shallow shotgun metagenome sequencing. Using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), we measured biological variability over 6 months. We estimated case numbers for 1:1 or 1:3 matched case-control studies, considering significance levels of 0.05 and 0.001 with 80% power, based on the collected fecal specimens per participant.

resultsThe fecal microbiome's temporal stability over 6 months varied (ICC < 0.6) for most alpha and beta diversity metrics. Heterogeneity was seen in species, genes, and pathways stability (ICC, 0.0-0.9). Detecting an OR of 1.5 per SD required 1,000 to 5,000 cases (0.05 significance for alpha and beta; 0.001 for species, genes, and pathways) with equal cases and controls. Low-prevalence species needed 15,102 cases, and high-prevalence species required 3,527. Similar needs applied to genes and pathways. In a 1:3 matched case-control study with one fecal specimen, 10,068 cases were needed for low-prevalence species and 2,351 for high-prevalence species. For ORs of 1.5 with multiple specimens, cases needed for low-prevalence species were 15,102 (one specimen), 8,267 (two specimens), and 5,989 (three specimens).

conclusionsDetecting disease associations requires a large number of cases. Repeating prediagnostic samples and matching cases to more controls could decrease the needed number of cases for such detections. IMPACT: Our results will help future epidemiologic study designs and implement well-powered microbiome studies.

Indexed as

FecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMetagenomeMicrobiotaCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSample Size

Identifiers

PMID39927868
PMCPMC12415979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.