ReviewMolecular oncology2025
Addressing persistent challenges in digital image analysis of cancer tissue: resources developed from a hackathon.
Review in Molecular oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nallan's Direct Ray: An Innovative Gyroscopic-Guided Radiographic Device for Intraoral Radiography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Representation learning enables robust single cell phenotyping in whole slide liquid biopsy imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Contrastive Representation Learning for Single Cell Phenotyping in Whole Slide Imaging of Enrichment-free Liquid Biopsy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Quality Control for Single Cell Analysis of High-plex Tissue Profiles using CyLinter.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) supports numerous research consortia that rely on imaging technologies to study cancerous tissues. To foster collaboration and innovation in this field, the Image Analysis Working Group (IAWG) was created in 2019. As multiplexed imaging techniques grow in scale and complexity, more advanced computational methods are required beyond traditional approaches like segmentation and pixel intensity quantification. In 2022, the IAWG held a virtual hackathon focused on addressing challenges in analyzing complex, high-dimensional datasets from fixed cancer tissues. The hackathon addressed key challenges in three areas: (1) cell type classification and assessment, (2) spatial data visualization and translation, and (3) scaling image analysis for large, multi-terabyte datasets. Participants explored the limitations of current automated analysis tools, developed potential solutions, and made significant progress during the hackathon. Here we provide a summary of the efforts and resultant resources and highlight remaining challenges facing the research community as emerging technologies are integrated into diverse imaging modalities and data analysis platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.