Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39927639›Full record

ArticleInsect molecular biology2025

The molecular mechanisms of defensive-grade organic acid biosynthesis in ground beetles.

Adam M Rork, Sihang Xu, Athula Attygalle, Tanya Renner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insect molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam M RorkDepartment of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8608-553X
Sihang XuDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.
Athula AttygalleDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.
Tanya RennerDepartment of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

Coleopterists SocietyNational Institute of Food and AgricultureNational Science Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects are known to synthesise and secrete hundreds of unique defensive chemicals, including caustic acids, pungent phenolics and citrusy terpenes. Despite efforts to characterise the defensive chemistry of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae), our knowledge of semiochemical evolution within the family and how these compounds are biosynthesised remains limited. Few studies have demonstrated the likely biosynthetic precursors of select compounds in certain taxa and only one has demonstrated which genes may be involved in the biosynthesis of formic acid. Here, we characterise the defensive chemistry and generate defensive gland transcriptomes for ground beetle species representing two defensive chemical classes: the formic acid producer Platynus angustatus and the methacrylic acid producer Pterostichus moestus. Through comparative transcriptome analyses, we demonstrate that co-option of distinct primary metabolic pathways may be involved in formic acid and methacrylic acid biosynthesis in the defensive glands of these taxa. These results expand our knowledge of ground beetle defensive chemistry and provide additional evidence that co-option of existing primary metabolic pathways plays a major role in the evolution of ground beetle chemical defence.

Indexed as

ColeopteraFormatesAnimalsTranscriptomeFormatesformic acidCarabidaeevolutionexocrinefolate cyclevaline catabolism

Identifiers

PMID39927639
PMCPMC12419134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.