Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39927634›Full record

ReviewACS applied bio materials2025

Graphene-Based Polymeric Microneedles for Biomedical Applications: A Comprehensive Review.

Somayeh Moradi, Faezeh Nargesi Azam, Hossein Abdollahi, Nariman Rajabifar, Amir Rostami, Pablo Guzman, Payam Zarrintaj, Seyed Mohammad Davachi

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS applied bio materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Somayeh MoradiDepartment of Polymer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia 57561-51818, Iran.
Faezeh Nargesi AzamPolymer Engineering Department, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran 14115-114, Iran.
Hossein AbdollahiDepartment of Polymer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia 57561-51818, Iran.
Nariman RajabifarDepartment of Polymer Engineering and Color Technology, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran 15875-4413, Iran.
Amir RostamiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Petroleum, Gas and Petrochemical Engineering, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr 75169-13817, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-0989-9724
Pablo GuzmanDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, Texas 78041, United States.
Payam ZarrintajDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, Texas 78041, United States.
Seyed Mohammad DavachiDepartment of Biology and Chemistry, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, Texas 78041, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7002-3708

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transdermal drug delivery presents a promising noninvasive approach, bypassing first-pass metabolism and gastrointestinal degradation. However, the stratum corneum (SC) barrier limits drug absorption, necessitating the development of effective delivery systems. Microneedles, particularly polymer-based ones, offer a solution by penetrating the SC while avoiding critical nerves and capillaries. These microneedles are biodegradable, nontoxic, and easily manufacturable, making them a highly attractive platform for transdermal drug delivery. However, their clinical application remains limited due to suboptimal therapeutic efficacy and slow drug release rates. Recent advancements have introduced the incorporation of nanodrugs, such as nanoparticles and encapsulated drugs, into microneedles to enhance drug delivery efficiency. Among the materials explored, graphene and its derivatives, including graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO), have garnered significant attention. Their exceptional mechanical strength, electrical conductivity, and antibacterial properties not only improve the mechanical performance of microneedles but also enhance drug release rates and biocompatibility. This review synthesizes the current state of microneedle technologies, focusing on the materials, fabrication techniques, and performance challenges. It particularly examines the potential of graphene-based microneedles, comparing them to traditional polymer-based microneedles in terms of drug release efficiency and stability. The review highlights key challenges, such as scalability, biocompatibility, and fabrication complexity, and suggests future research directions to address these issues. The incorporation of graphene quantum dots (GQDs) is identified as a promising avenue for improving drug release profiles, stability, and real-time tracking of drug diffusion. Finally, the review outlines emerging applications, including smart drug delivery systems, biosensing, and real-time monitoring, urging further exploration to unlock the full potential of graphene-enhanced microneedles in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsDrug Delivery SystemsGraphiteNeedlesPolymersAdministration, CutaneousAnimalsHumansParticle SizeBiocompatible Materialsgraphene oxideGraphitePolymersbiomedical applicationdrug deliveryGraphenemicroneedlestransdermal

Identifiers

PMID39927634
PMCPMC11921037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.