ArticleMolecular oncology2025
Classification of acute myeloid leukemia based on multi-omics and prognosis prediction value.
Article in Molecular oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetics and In Silico Transcriptome Analysis of Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia.European journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Putting the I in AML: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cells · 2026Review
- Genotoxicity of cancer therapies and the risk of secondary malignancies: toward personalized prevention.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Diagnosis-Driven Targeted Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Clinical Integration of Tyrosine Kinase, BCL-2, and CD33-Directed Strategies with Midostaurin, Venetoclax, and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Computer-aided drug design in acute myeloid leukemia: a comprehensive review of advances, challenges, and future prospect.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- Machine learning prediction for AML based on 3D genome selected circRNA.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Recent advances in deep learning for leukemia diagnosis: a scoping review of diagnostic modalities and fusion-based approaches.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Liquid Biopsy and Epigenetic Signatures in AML, ALL, and CNS Tumors: Diagnostic and Monitoring Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Research advances in the adjunctive diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous cancer, making outcomes prediction challenging. Several predictive and prognostic models are used but have considerable inaccuracy at individual level. We tried to increase prediction accuracy using a multi-omics strategy. We interrogated data from 1391 consecutive, newly diagnosed subjects with AML, integrating information on mutation topography, DNA methylation, and transcriptomics. We developed an unsupervised multi-omics classification system (UAMOCS) with these data. UAMOCS provides a multidimensional understanding of AML heterogeneity and stratifies subjects into three cohorts: (a) UAMOCS1 [high lymphocyte activating 3 (LAG3) expression, chromosome instability, myelodysplasia-related mutations]; (b) UAMOCS2 (monocytic-like profile, immune suppression and activated angiogenesis and hypoxia pathways); and (c) UAMOCS3 [CCAAT enhancer binding protein alpha (CEBPA) mutations and MYC pathway activation]. UAMOCS distinguishes overall survival rates across the cohorts (TCGA P = 0.042; GSE71014 P = 0.043; ihCAMs-AML, GSE102691 and GSE37642 all P < 0.001). The model's C-statistic is comparable to the 2022 ELN risk classification (0.87 vs 0.82; P = 0.162), but offers a more nuanced distinction between intermediate- and high-risk groups. When combined with high-throughput drug sensitivity testing, UAMOCS can accurately predict sensitivity to azacitidine (AZA) and venetoclax. The UAMOCS system is available as an R package. The UAMOCS system has the potential to redefine AML subtypes, enhance prognostic predictions, and guide treatment strategies based on patients' immune status and expected responses to therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.