Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39927419›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2025

SEEG in 2025: progress and pending challenges in stereotaxy methods, biomarkers and radiofrequency thermocoagulation.

Philippe Ryvlin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Philippe RyvlinDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Member of the ERN Epicare, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTechnological innovations and clinical research in SEEG have dramatically increased with its worldwide dissemination. In this review, we summarize the main advances in the field from the last 5 years. RECENT

findingsSeveral large series and meta-analyses have provided consistent data regarding a lower risk of serious complications with SEEG as compared to sub-dural grids, while some studies also suggest a greater diagnostic value. The safety and precision of SEEG partly depends on the type of vascular imaging and method of implantation, with some series suggesting that MR angiography might not provide an optimal delineation of electrode-vessel conflicts and that frameless stereotaxy lacks precision. Noninvasive frame coupled with robot-guided implantation might offer the best precision/invasiveness tradeoff. Small series suggest that SEEG can be safely performed from the age of 16 months, and that adding electrodes during SEEG often prove beneficial. Transhemispheric electrodes targeting the mesial frontal structures, bilaterally, proved safe and informative. Several interictal and ictal biomarkers of the epileptogenic zone have been investigated. Although high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) remain a biomarker of interest, a randomized controlled trial failed to demonstrate its diagnostic value against spikes. Furthermore, other interictal biomarkers proved to better correlate with the epileptogenic zone than HFOs rate, including spike-gamma and spike-ripples. Ictal biomarkers of interest include the so-called chirp and epileptogenic zone fingerprint. Overall, recent data suggest that high-frequency activities are not a mandatory feature of interictal and ictal biomarkers of the epileptogenic zone. Radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) performed during SEEG investigation have also progressed, with some authors reporting spectacular rates of seizure freedom in patients with localized epileptogenic lesion but also mesial temporal sclerosis. However, a systematic assessment of memory and mental health demonstrated the presence of altered memory and psychiatric complications in a significant proportion of mesial temporal lobe RFTC. SUMMARY: Progress has been made in the technology and methods used to perform SEEG and RFTC, with the view to increase safety and effectiveness. Several interictal and ictal biomarkers appear promising but still face challenges in their validation and implementation in clinical practice. Future research requires harmonization in the concepts of the seizure onset and epileptogenic zones, and prospective pathology-specific studies.

Indexed as

ElectrocoagulationElectroencephalographyEpilepsyStereotaxic TechniquesBiomarkersHumansBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID39927419
PMCPMC11888833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.