ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2025
SEEG in 2025: progress and pending challenges in stereotaxy methods, biomarkers and radiofrequency thermocoagulation.
Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Optimal Size of Electrocorticography Grids for Classification of Hand Movements.Neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Epilepsy : Current Evidence, Clinical Impact, and Future Directions.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes and learning curve of MRgLITT system for drug-resistant epilepsy in China: A single-center retrospective study.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Safety of postimplantation MRI with Dixi microdeep electrodes in situ: An in vitro evaluation of MRI-related heating at 1.5T.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Postictal self-removal of intracerebral electrodes during stereoelectroencephalography monitoring: A case series.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026Article
- Areas of research priorities in epilepsy: A position paper of the European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies, EpiCARE.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Modern Aspects of Invasive Epilepsy Monitoring: Utility for Seizure Localization and Therapeutic Decision-Making.Pediatric neurosurgery · 2026Review
- PyHFO 2.0: an open-source platform for deep learning-based clinical high-frequency oscillations analysis.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTechnological innovations and clinical research in SEEG have dramatically increased with its worldwide dissemination. In this review, we summarize the main advances in the field from the last 5 years. RECENT
findingsSeveral large series and meta-analyses have provided consistent data regarding a lower risk of serious complications with SEEG as compared to sub-dural grids, while some studies also suggest a greater diagnostic value. The safety and precision of SEEG partly depends on the type of vascular imaging and method of implantation, with some series suggesting that MR angiography might not provide an optimal delineation of electrode-vessel conflicts and that frameless stereotaxy lacks precision. Noninvasive frame coupled with robot-guided implantation might offer the best precision/invasiveness tradeoff. Small series suggest that SEEG can be safely performed from the age of 16 months, and that adding electrodes during SEEG often prove beneficial. Transhemispheric electrodes targeting the mesial frontal structures, bilaterally, proved safe and informative. Several interictal and ictal biomarkers of the epileptogenic zone have been investigated. Although high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) remain a biomarker of interest, a randomized controlled trial failed to demonstrate its diagnostic value against spikes. Furthermore, other interictal biomarkers proved to better correlate with the epileptogenic zone than HFOs rate, including spike-gamma and spike-ripples. Ictal biomarkers of interest include the so-called chirp and epileptogenic zone fingerprint. Overall, recent data suggest that high-frequency activities are not a mandatory feature of interictal and ictal biomarkers of the epileptogenic zone. Radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC) performed during SEEG investigation have also progressed, with some authors reporting spectacular rates of seizure freedom in patients with localized epileptogenic lesion but also mesial temporal sclerosis. However, a systematic assessment of memory and mental health demonstrated the presence of altered memory and psychiatric complications in a significant proportion of mesial temporal lobe RFTC. SUMMARY: Progress has been made in the technology and methods used to perform SEEG and RFTC, with the view to increase safety and effectiveness. Several interictal and ictal biomarkers appear promising but still face challenges in their validation and implementation in clinical practice. Future research requires harmonization in the concepts of the seizure onset and epileptogenic zones, and prospective pathology-specific studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.