ArticleOpen veterinary journal2024
Effects of a blend extract of
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breastfeeding is vital for infant health, providing essential nutrients and protection against infections. Despite the benefits, many postpartum women face challenges in breastfeeding due to hypogalactia caused by stress, anxiety, or maternal illness. While medications, such as metoclopramide and domperidone, are sometimes prescribed to increase milk supply, they are limited due to safety concerns. As a result, there is a growing interest in alternative nonpharmacological interventions, including herbal galactagogues. Plants, such as Aim: This study aimed to investigate the influence of a combination of Methods: Twenty-four Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into four groups at parturition. Each group, comprising six dams, was assigned a specific dose of 37.5, 75, and 150 mg/kg of the blended extract orally for 20 days postpartum, with one group serving as the control. Mammary glands were harvested and assayed for prolactin expression by immunohistochemistry. Results: The results showed that while the rate of milk production did not increase linearly with the duration of lactation, rats treated with the blended extract at a dose of 75 mg/kg exhibited higher milk production than the control group. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed increased prolactin expression in the mammary glands of rats treated with blend extract at 37.5 mg/kg ( Conclusion: The blended extract of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.