Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39927371›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2024

Pharmacodynamics of single-dose omecamtiv mecarbil administered intravenously in clinically healthy cats.

Mio Ishizaka, Huai-Hsun Hsu, Yuichi Miyagawa, Naoyuki Takemura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mio IshizakaThe Laboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine II, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, Musashino-shi, Japan.
Huai-Hsun HsuTaiwan National Chung Hsing University Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yuichi MiyagawaThe Laboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine II, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, Musashino-shi, Japan.
Naoyuki TakemuraThe Laboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine II, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, Musashino-shi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM), a selective cardiac myosin activator, is gaining attention as a potential heart failure (HF) treatment because it can enhance cardiac contractility without adverse effects. Concerns were raised about arrhythmias with conventional HF treatments in cats. Despite OM's promise in veterinary medicine, no studies have confirmed its efficacy in cats. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the pharmacodynamics of OM in cats. Methods: Five clinically healthy cats were used. OM's efficacy was examined in three doses: 0.1, 0.25, and 1.0 mg/kg. To minimize the effect on heart rates, the cats were under general anesthesia, and baseline measurements were taken after the heart rate and blood pressure had stabilized. OM was administered as a single intravenous injection. Echocardiography was performed 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after administration. Heart rate and blood pressure were measured before each echocardiographic examination. Results: The heart rates decreased at all doses; significant reductions were seen at 0.25 and 1.0 mg/kg. All doses enhanced cardiac contractility, showing a dose-dependent effect. Blood pressure remained unchanged. Conclusion: OM enhances cardiac contractility in cats, with 0.25 mg/kg being the optimal dose.

Indexed as

CarbamatesUreaAnimalsBlood PressureCatsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEchocardiographyFemaleHeart RateInjections, IntravenousMaleCarbamatesomecamtiv mecarbilUreaCardiomyopathyFelineHeart failureOmecamtiv mecarbil

Identifiers

PMID39927371
PMCPMC11799624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.