Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39927366›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2024

Molecular detection of

Zahraa Mustafa Al-Jumaa, Mohammed Tariq Jaber, Atheer Abdulrazzaq Al-Doori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zahraa Mustafa Al-JumaaDepartment of Internal and Preventive Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul, Nineveh, Iraq.
Mohammed Tariq JaberDepartment of Forensic Biology, Higher Institute of Forensic Sciences, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Atheer Abdulrazzaq Al-DooriDepartment of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of Methods: Molecular detection was done using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) approach. Fifty shelter cats of various ages, sexes, and breeds participated in the study from 1/11/2023 to 1/4/2024. DNA was extracted and amplified using PCR. Results: The study's findings revealed that the PCR technique showed that 22/44% of positive cats from a total of 50 cats were assured for the 23S rRNA gene and yielded a band at 400 bp, and for 41/27.3%, these findings are regarded as distinctive for the genus Conclusion: In conclusion of this study, a significant number of cats are infected with

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesChlamydophilaChlamydophila InfectionsConjunctivitisRespiratory Tract InfectionsAnimalsCatsConjunctivaFemaleIranMalePolymerase Chain ReactionPrevalenceCo-infectionFeline chlamydophilasisPCRShelter catsURTI

Identifiers

PMID39927366
PMCPMC11799655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.