ArticleOpen veterinary journal2024
Antimicrobial prescribing during telemedicine appointments.
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While veterinarians have practiced telemedicine in various forms for years, the arrival of reliable, synchronous videoconferencing has increased the use of telemedicine for care delivery, a trend accelerated by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. However, data are sparse on antimicrobial drug (AMD) prescription practices in this setting. Aim: This assessment looked at AMD prescription practices among veterinarians using a telemedicine platform for care delivery in the United States. Methods: We surveyed U.S. veterinarians online about their most recent telemedicine appointments using association and veterinary college mailing lists and social media veterinary groups. Demographic information was collected along with information on the species of the animal, the chief complaint, treatment recommendations, the type of telemedicine platform used, and if the pet owner discussed AMDs during the appointment before a recommendation was made. Results: A total of 88 veterinarians from 25 U.S. states responded to the survey. Of the 88 telemedicine appointments, 15% (13) resulted in a prescription for an oral antibiotic. AMDs were prescribed for 5% (2/37) of canines and 25% (5/20) of felines; and for a variety of complaints including ear/nose/throat, dermatologic, ophthalmic, respiratory, musculoskeletal, and gastrointestinal complaints. Veterinarians with <15 years in practice prescribed AMDs more frequently than those practicing for ≥15 years (23%; 10/44 Conclusion: AMD prescribing rates in this assessment of telemedicine appointments were comparable to those reported for in-person visits in the United States. Veterinarians with fewer years of experience were more likely to prescribe AMDs during a telemedicine visit, suggesting a higher level of comfort with prescribing among younger veterinarians and highlighting the need for continued education around telemedicine and antimicrobial stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.