ArticleActa ortopedica brasileira2025
PEDIATRIC FRACTURES IN A TERTIARY PUBLIC HOSPITAL: WHAT ARE WE DEALING WITH?
Article in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Orthopedic trauma is significant in modern society due to its incidence and its impact on healthcare and social interactions. Concerns include the risk of permanent sequelae affecting individual development and causing social stigma. Fractures, while not the most lethal lesion, may result in physical variable disability; publications show that about 30% of children experience fractures by skeletal maturity, primarily from low-energy trauma. This study aims to identify the fracture patterns in the immature skeleton at a tertiary-level public hospital. Methods: Individuals with skeletally immature fractures of the locomotor system, treated at a tertiary-level emergency unit from January 2016 to January 2020, were included. Data collected included social characteristics, trauma origin, fracture descriptors, and treatment modality. Age groups: infant, preschool, school-age, adolescent. Trauma energy is classified as low, moderate, or high. Results: A total of 926 cases were recorded in 505 patients, with a predominance of males. The most affected bones were the radius (29.5%), humerus (24.2%), and ulna (15.8%). The metaphysis was the most common location (46.7%), followed by the diaphysis (33.2%). Falls accounted for the largest portion, at 64.7%, with the majority (364) being low-energy trauma. High-energy trauma, such as pedestrian accidents and car accidents, represented 13.7%, and of these, 54.2% were polytraumatized. Conclusion: Fractures of the forearm persist as the most common, particularly at the distal third of the radius, with males being more exposed. Climatic seasonality and cultural traits such as soccer practice have little impact on the epidemiology of fractures. The results obtained in this investigation resemble those obtained by international literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.