ArticleMedicine international
Prevalence of and risk factors for long COVID following infection with the COVID‑19 omicron variant.
Article in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants and demographic factors on COVID-19 severity in pediatric patients.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Mapping spatial and social inequities of long COVID across the United States: a retrospective cohort study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Clinical Utility of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Titers in the Management of Patients With Long COVID Infected With the Omicron Variant.British journal of biomedical science · 2026Observational
- Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein Possess Autoimmune Properties.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical Evaluation of Oxidative Stress Markers in Patients with Long COVID During the Omicron Phase in Japan.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prevalence, Evolution and Prognostic Factors of PASC in a Cohort of Patients Discharged from a COVID Unit.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to clarify the current status of persistent symptoms following omicron variants of COVID-19 [long COVID (LC)] and the risk factors associated with the development of LC. For this purpose, a cross-sectional survey of patients with COVID-19 treated at the authors' hospital and at four associated outpatient clinics was conducted. Questionnaires about a post-infection condition were sent by post to 3,399 patients. A comparison was made of patients infected when the omicron variant was prevalent (omicron group) and patients infected prior to that (pre-omicron group). Valid responses were received from 1,113 (32.7%) patients. The percentages of patients in whom some type of symptom or sequelae continued after 1, 3 and 6 months were 44, 37 and 28%, respectively, in the pre-omicron group, and 20, 12 and 9%, respectively, in the omicron group. The percentages were significantly lower in the omicron group. In the multivariate analysis of risk factors for LC at 3 months, significant risk factors were hospitalization [odds ratio (OR), 1.910; P<0.01] and old age (OR, 1.120; P<0.05). Conversely, the incidence of LC was lower with vaccination (OR, 0.830; P<0.01) and in the omicron group (OR, 0.490; P<0.01). In the omicron group, underlying disease (particularly emphysema, bronchial asthma, rheumatoid or collagen disease and hypertension) and hospitalization were significantly associated with LC (P<0.01). On the whole, the present study demonstrates that the incidence of LC was >10% even in the omicron group. Patients who required hospitalization and patients with underlying conditions require careful attention for the development of LC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.