Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39927290›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2025

Sequali: efficient and comprehensive quality control of short- and long-read sequencing data.

Ruben H P Vorderman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ruben H P VordermanSequencing Analysis Support Core, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden 2300RC, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8813-1528

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Quality control of sequencing data is the first step in many sequencing workflows. Short- and long-read sequencing technologies have many commonalities with regard to quality control. Several quality control programs exist; however, none possess a feature set that is adequate for both technologies. Quality control programs aimed at Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing lack vital features, such as adapter searching, overrepresented sequence analysis, and duplication analysis. Results: Sequali was developed to provide sequencing quality control for both short- and long-read sequencing technologies. It features adapter search, overrepresented sequence analysis, and duplication analysis and supports FASTQ and uBAM inputs. It is significantly faster than comparable sequencing quality control programs for both short- and long-read sequencing technologies. Availability and Implementation: Sequali is an open-source Python application using C extensions and is freely available under the AGPL-3.0 license at https://github.com/rhpvorderman/sequali. The source code for each release is archived at zenodo: https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10822485.

Identifiers

PMID39927290
PMCPMC11802474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.