Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39927270›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Psychological safety in health professions education: insights and strategies from a global community of practice.

Chaoyan Dong, Lisa Altshuler, Nobutaro Ban, Lee Yuen Wong, Fatima Elbasri Abuelgasim Mohammed, Chao Tian Tang, Elizabeth Kachur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chaoyan DongSengkang General Hospital, Education Office, Singapore, Singapore.
Lisa AltshulerNew York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Nobutaro BanAichi Medical University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Lee Yuen WongOrthopaedic Surgery Department, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Fatima Elbasri Abuelgasim MohammedFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
Chao Tian TangDepartment of Psychiatry, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Elizabeth KachurMedical Education Development, Global Consulting, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychological safety is the belief that one will not be punished or humiliated for speaking up, sharing ideas, raising concerns, or making mistakes. There are various threats to psychological safety in health professions education (HPE). This commentary applies Clark's model of psychological safety (Inclusion Safety, Learner Safety, Contributor Safety, Challenger Safety) to five different HPE settings (classroom instructions, clinical training, simulation-based training, online instructions, interprofessional education). Setting-specific threats and strategies for enhancing psychological safety are discussed.

Indexed as

health professions educationinterprofessional educationpsychological safetysimulation-based medical educationteam-based learning

Identifiers

PMID39927270
PMCPMC11802526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.