Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39927268›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Diagnosis and detection of bone fracture in radiographic images using deep learning approaches.

Theyazn Aldhyani, Zeyad A T Ahmed, Bayan M Alsharbi, Sultan Ahmad, Mosleh Hmoud Al-Adhaileh, Ahmed Hassan Kamal, Mohammed Almaiah, Jabeen Nazeer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Theyazn AldhyaniApplied College, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Zeyad A T AhmedDepartment of Computer Science, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, India.
Bayan M AlsharbiDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Sultan AhmadDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.
Mosleh Hmoud Al-AdhailehDeanship of E-Learning and Distance Education and Information Technology, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed Hassan KamalDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlmaiahKing Abdullah the II IT School, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Jabeen NazeerDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Bones are a fundamental component of human anatomy, enabling movement and support. Bone fractures are prevalent in the human body, and their accurate diagnosis is crucial in medical practice. In response to this challenge, researchers have turned to deep-learning (DL) algorithms. Recent advancements in sophisticated DL methodologies have helped overcome existing issues in fracture detection. Methods: Nevertheless, it is essential to develop an automated approach for identifying fractures using the multi-region X-ray dataset from Kaggle, which contains a comprehensive collection of 10,580 radiographic images. This study advocates for the use of DL techniques, including VGG16, ResNet152V2, and DenseNet201, for the detection and diagnosis of bone fractures. Results: The experimental findings demonstrate that the proposed approach accurately identifies and classifies various types of fractures. Our system, incorporating DenseNet201 and VGG16, achieved an accuracy rate of 97% during the validation phase. By addressing these challenges, we can further improve DL models for fracture detection. This article tackles the limitations of existing methods for fracture detection and diagnosis and proposes a system that improves accuracy. Conclusion: The findings lay the foundation for future improvements to radiographic systems used in bone fracture diagnosis.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebone fracturesdeep learningdiagnosisradiographic images

Identifiers

PMID39927268
PMCPMC11803505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.