ArticleVisceral medicine2025
A German's Perspective on the Way toward Ambulatory Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Postoperative Questionnaire.
Article in Visceral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ambulatory surgeries are on the rise in recent years and can offer benefits to patients as well as healthcare providers. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the procedures commonly done in an ambulatory setting, in some European countries. This study aims to gather patients' perceptions towards ambulatory cholecystectomy after undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an inpatient setting. Methods: A total of 300 patients from two different hospitals in Germany received a postoperative questionnaire aimed at evaluating their willingness to undergo an ambulatory surgery. Surgeries were performed between January 1, 2017, and July 11, 2018. Operation setting (acute vs. elective), ASA classification, length of hospital stay, age, sex, living situation and location (city vs. rural), as well as status of employment were documented. Results: Overall, 23% of patients reported considering ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ALC), while 77% rejected an ALC. Objections included fear of complications (69%), anticipated pain (65%), concerns about their living situation/home care (21%), other reasons (8%), nausea and vomiting (3.4%). Baseline characteristics of the participants provided no statistical significance on willingness to undergo ALC: acute versus elective ( Conclusion: There is a willingness for ALC, albeit still limited. Chosen criteria did not show a significant association for positive perception of ALC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.