ArticleEpilepsy & behavior reports2025
The use of newer anti-seizure medicines in women with epilepsy in pregnancy: A case series.
Article in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lacosamide Safety During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: A Single-Centre Experience and Comprehensive Narrative Review.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Electroceuticals for Motherhood: Utility of responsive neurostimulation and Proactive antiseizure medication management in two pregnancies.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2025Article
- New onset refractory status epilepticus diagnosed in the second trimester: A case report.Obstetric medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epilepsy is a common serious neurological disorder, affecting approximately 28 per 10,000 pregnancies internationally each year. There are limited data on the use of newer anti-seizure medicines (ASMs) in pregnancy, despite increasing use. We aimed to describe the use of newer ASMs in women with epilepsy (WWE) attending the Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, in pregnancy, between 2018 and 2023. We conducted a retrospective case series using electronic health record data. All WWE with a medication order for a newer ASM and a completed pregnancy were included. We identified 34 pregnancies exposed to newer ASMs, namely zonisamide (35.2 %), brivaracetam (23.5 %), eslicarbazepine (23.5 %), lacosamide (17.6 %), and perampanel (2.9 %). Newer ASMs were used as monotherapy in 58.8 % cases. Levetiracetam was the most commonly prescribed concomitant ASM in polytherapy regimens (32.4 %). Seizures occurred during pregnancy or the postpartum period in 50.0 % and 14.7 % of pregnancies, respectively. Twenty-eight pregnancies (80 %) resulted in a livebirth, with median gestation and birth weight of 39 weeks' [IQR 2] and 3100 g [IQR 790]. One neonate exposed to polytherapy including eslicarbazepine was observed to have a minor anomaly at birth, not requiring follow-up. Findings show that in WWE, most pregnancies exposed to newer ASMs resulted in healthy livebirths at term without negative outcomes. A high proportion of polytherapy exposures and high rate of seizures during pregnancy suggests that this may be a cohort at greater risk for caesarean section or other complications. Findings should be interpreted with caution, with additional data needed to examine the impact of individual ASMs on outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.