ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025
Perceptions and Motivations of Japanese Medical Students Regarding Course Evaluations: A Cultural Perspective.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Student Perspectives on the Efficacy of Hybrid Simulation Laboratory Teaching-Practicing Modules.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Course evaluations are critical for improving educational practices; however, their results can be influenced by various unexpected factors, including cultural values. Despite several studies on cultural dimensions in course evaluations, Japanese students were rarely the focus of evaluation in the Asian context. Data on Japanese students' evaluation practices may reveal diverse behavioral patterns in Asian countries, highlighting the value of country-specific studies to uncover unique educational contexts. This study explores, through a cultural lens, how Japanese medical students perceive course evaluations and the factors influencing their participation. Methods: Four Focus Groups were created with 23 third- and fourth-year medical students. The recorded discussion data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach by applying Hofstede's model of six cultural dimensions as a theoretical framework. Results: This study identified three main themes influencing student participation in course evaluations: their emotions, insufficient understanding of the evaluations' significance, and logistics impacting student motivation. Gratitude positively influenced their decision to participate in course evaluations, whereas anger, anxiety about presumptuousness, fear and indifference had a negative impact. Additionally, their willingness to participate was positively influenced by the perceived benefits for future students. Logistics, including the timing of evaluations and the design of the online evaluation form, also contributed to either encouraging or discouraging their participation. Conclusion: This study has illuminated factors shaping medical students' perceptions and motivations regarding course evaluation through Hofstede's model. These include "perfectionism" associated with decisiveness, "the attitude of accepting the status" linked to restraint, "teacher-centered education" and "respect for authority" related to power distance, "peer pressure" reflecting collectivism, and "risk avoidance" tied to uncertainty avoidance. Understanding these cultural nuances is crucial for the effective implementation of course evaluations in medical schools, as they offer valuable insights into how cultural contexts influence perceptions and motivations across diverse educational environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.