ArticleJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases2025
Two-centers machine learning analysis for predicting acid-fast bacilli results in tuberculosis sputum tests.
Article in Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning analysis for predicting acid-fast bacilli results in tuberculosis sputum tests: Comment.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a chronic respiratory infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, typically diagnosed through sputum smear microscopy for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) to assess the infectivity of TB. Methods: This study enrolled 769 patients, including 641 patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University as the training group, and 128 patients from Guangxi Hospital of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University as the validation group. Among the training cohort, 107 patients were AFB-positive, and 534 were AFB-negative. In the validation cohort, 24 were AFB-positive, and 104 were AFB-negative. Blood samples were collected and analyzed using machine learning (ML) methods to identify key factors for TB diagnosis. Results: Several ML methods were compared, and support vector machine recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) was selected to construct a nomogram diagnostic model. The area under the curve (AUC) of the diagnostic model was 0.721 in the training cohort and 0.758 in the validation cohort. The model demonstrated clinical utility when the threshold was between 38% and 94%, with the NONE line above the ALL line in the decision curve analysis. Conclusion: We developed a diagnostic model using multiple ML methods to predict AFB results, achieving satisfactory diagnostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.