Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39927132›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025

US parent perspectives on teen caffeine intake: An opportunity for health care provider guidance.

Sarah J Clark, Acham Gebremariam, Sara Schultz, Lindsey Ewing, Susan J Woolford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah J ClarkSusan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, University of Michigan Health, 300 North Ingalls Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5456, USA.
Acham GebremariamSusan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, University of Michigan Health, 300 North Ingalls Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5456, USA.
Sara SchultzSusan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, University of Michigan Health, 300 North Ingalls Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5456, USA.
Lindsey EwingSusan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, University of Michigan Health, 300 North Ingalls Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5456, USA.
Susan J WoolfordSusan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research (CHEAR) Center, University of Michigan Health, 300 North Ingalls Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5456, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To explore parental knowledge and behaviors regarding their adolescent's intake of caffeine to provide context as to what guidance from health care providers could be helpful for families. Methods: Data were collected in February 2024 as part of a nationally representative online panel survey of US parents. Weighted percentages and bivariate associations between survey responses and respondent characteristics were generated. Results: Among the 1095 respondents, about two-thirds of parents reported that their teen consumes caffeine at least one day per week. Parents of daily caffeine consumers were less informed about the caffeine content of beverages they purchase and less likely to report that their teen knows about the risks of "too much" caffeine. Parents who rarely look at caffeine amounts were less likely to agree that they know which products have high caffeine and whether their teen is consuming too much caffeine. Parents believe most teen caffeine consumption occurs at home and, among parents who report their teen consumes caffeine at least four days per week, to be primarily motivated by taste. Conclusions: Parental perspectives related to their teen's caffeine consumption indicate an opportunity for health care providers to educate and promote family discussions regarding caffeine intake.

Indexed as

AdolescentsCaffeineHealth impactsParent perspectivesProvider guidance

Identifiers

PMID39927132
PMCPMC11803162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.