ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025
Smokeless tobacco excise taxes in the US: Standardizing the measurement for empirical analysis.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How the sales of oral nicotine pouches correlate with prices and respond to taxes on cigarettes and e-cigarettes.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2025Article
- The effect of smokeless tobacco (SLT) excise taxes on SLT use among youth.The International journal on drug policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The effect of smokeless tobacco (SLT) taxes on SLT use has received relatively little research attention in the US compared to the extensive focus on cigarette and e-cigarette taxation. The scarcity of SLT literature is partially due to the complexities of SLT taxes and the lack of standardized taxes. While some states imposed specific taxes based on the weight of the products, others imposed Objective: We standardize SLT taxes into two measures: first, we convert Methods: We extracted sales-weighted retail prices from the Nielsen Retail Scanner Data between 2006 and 2020. We developed a method to standardize SLT taxes. Results: Overall, the standardized SLT taxes exhibit a steadily increasing trend. In the fourth quarter of 2020, the average specific tax for chewing tobacco, moist snuff, dry snuff, and snus was $0.36, $0.91, $0.74, and $1.27 per ounce, respectively. The average Conclusions: The SLT tax data provided here can serve as a valuable tool for policymakers in determining and refining SLT tax rates, further allowing future studies to understand their impacts on SLT use and related disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.