Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39927068›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024

Efficacy of Antibiotic Versus Probiotics as Adjuncts to Mechanical Debridement for the Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis.

Sindhu Sudhakar Kumararama, Manali Patil, Bhavna Jha Kukreja, Manjiri Salkar, Shikha Verma, Naina Pattnaik, Lalit Patil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sindhu Sudhakar KumararamaDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Rajarajeswari Dental College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Manali PatilDepartment of Periodontology, Dr. G.D Pol Foundation Y.M.T Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Bhavna Jha KukrejaDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, UAE.
Manjiri SalkarDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Mahatma Gandhi Vidyamandir's K B H Dental College and Hospital, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
Shikha VermaSenior Dentist and Periodontist, Urmil Dental Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Naina PattnaikDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Kalinga Institute of Dental Science, KIIT Deemed to be University, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Lalit PatilDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College and Hospital, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Peri-implant mucositis, an inflammatory condition affecting the soft tissues surrounding dental implants, is commonly treated with mechanical debridement. The efficacy of adjunctive therapies, such as antibiotics and probiotics, in enhancing treatment outcomes remains a topic of interest. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 60 patients diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis. Patients were divided into three groups: group A (mechanical debridement alone), group B (mechanical debridement plus antibiotics), and group C (mechanical debridement plus probiotics). Clinical parameters, including probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and plaque index (PI), were recorded at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months post treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and post-hoc tests to compare the efficacy between groups. Results: At 1 month, group B showed a significant reduction in PD (mean reduction of 2.1 mm) and BOP (mean reduction of 40%) compared to group A (mean reduction of 1.2 mm in PD and 25% in BOP) and group C (mean reduction of 1.8 mm in PD and 35% in BOP). At 3 months, group C exhibited sustained improvement in PI (mean reduction of 50%) and BOP (mean reduction of 45%) compared to group B (mean reduction of 45% in PI and 40% in BOP) and group A (mean reduction of 30% in PI and 20% in BOP). Conclusion: Both antibiotics and probiotics as adjuncts to mechanical debridement demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis. Antibiotics showed a more pronounced immediate effect, while probiotics provided sustained improvements over a longer period.

Indexed as

Antibioticsclinical trialdental implantsinflammatory conditionmechanical debridementperi-implant mucositisprobioticstreatment efficacy

Identifiers

PMID39927068
PMCPMC11804995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.