ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
A Step-By-Step Guide of Bibliometric Study for Healthcare and Allied Research.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Virtual reality in neurorehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders: a bibliometric analysis from 2010 to 2025.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- From fracture-related injury to surgically modifiable risk: a trauma-focused bibliometric analysis of craniofacial nerve injuries.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
- Visualizing the development of robot-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: a comprehensive bibliometric study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Global research trends and thematic evolution in robot-assisted radical nephrectomy: a bibliometric and visualisation study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Global research trends on the gut microbiota and immunotherapy for colorectal cancer: a bibliometric analysis.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Initially started in the arena of business research and management studies, bibliometric analysis has become increasingly popular in the speciality of medical and dental research recently. Bibliometric analysis is proven to be a precious tool in unraveling and visualizing the collective knowledge of scientific literatures and developmental details of recognized fields through the systematic interpretation of extensive amounts of unstructured data. It provides scholars with the ability to obtain a comprehensive overview, pinpoint areas lacking in knowledge, generate novel research philosophies, and apply planned outcomes within the field. Well-executed bibliometric studies can provide scholars with valuable insights, including a broad outline of the research field of interest, identification of research gaps, generation of new research philosophies, and positioning of their contributions. A notable gap exists in the availability of a comprehensive guiding principle for bibliometric analysis in medical/dental research, presenting a notable problem for researchers eager to enhance their understanding of this methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.