ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Association between Oral Cancer and Smokeless Tobacco Use in Rural Indian Men: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Smokeless tobacco (SLT) use, particularly gutka and khaini, is a significant public health concern in India, mainly in rural areas. This prospective cohort study aimed to investigate the association between SLT use and oral cancer incidence among rural Indian men. Methods: A cohort of 300 rural Indian men without a history of oral cancer was recruited and followed for five years. Baseline data on SLT use (type, frequency, and duration) and other risk factors were collected. Annual oral examinations and medical record reviews were conducted to identify incident cases of oral cancer. Incidence rates, relative risks, and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated to assess the association between SLT use and oral cancer. Results: Among the 300 participants, 185 (61.7%) were SLT users at baseline. During follow-up, 25 incident cases of oral cancer were diagnosed. The incidence rate of oral cancer was significantly higher among SLT users (24.3 per 1,000 person-years) compared to non-users (5.4 per 1,000 person-years). After adjusting for confounders, the HR for oral cancer associated with SLT use was 4.51 (95% CI: 2.03-9.98), indicating a significantly increased risk. A dose-response relationship was observed, with higher frequency and longer duration of SLT use associated with increased risk. Conclusions: This study provides strong evidence for a significant association between SLT use and increased risk of oral cancer among rural Indian men. The findings underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions to reduce SLT use and promote oral cancer awareness in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.