ReviewJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2024
Accuracy and Stability of Clear Aligner Treatment: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multilevel Determinants of Engagement in Lifelong Learning in Orthodontics From Formal to AI-Supported Approaches: Development of a Conceptual Framework Through a Qualitative Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Do treatment outcomes of clear aligners remain stable over time? A systematic review.Journal of orthodontic science · 2026Review
- Review
- Effect of clear aligners and fixed appliances among orthodontic patients: A comparative study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review evaluates the long-term stability and retention of clear aligner treatment, focusing on factors like aligner compliance, attachment use, and treatment duration. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched electronic databases and manual sources, identifying 112 records and narrowing down to six relevant studies. These studies compared clear aligners to traditional braces, highlighting their effectiveness, especially for mild crowding and anterior movements. Clear aligners, particularly Invisalign, showed benefits like shorter treatment times and higher patient satisfaction. However, variability in treatment accuracy and limited long-term follow-up indicate a need for further research. Overall, clear aligners offer a discreet, flexible, and effective orthodontic option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.